im at work and didnt get to catch it. but i know my man woooooooodya on youtube should have it up later. other than the 1 p4p talk, whatelse did i miss?
Not at great deal - the P4P thing was the main aspect. Other than Sky Sports nobody in Britain will consider him #1, unless he schools Pac something silly - by that I mean 6/7 10-8 rounds and a stoppage. He needs a greater body of work at 147 to gain that accolade. Had he beaten Mayweather then fair enough, because Floyd was clearly the top dog, but Manny isn't. For a start JMM (for me) has two wins over him and a superior resume above 130.... Slappy cannot be discounted, nor Hopkins and Vasquez.
no need to swear sweetheart,:nono if all you haters think that manny is the p4p boxer for beating a very very extreamly shite ODLH,and winning 2 very very extreamly close fights to JMM,then its you lot who know **** all my little buttmuncher. as for hatton,he always sounds a twat when interveiwed,thinks he is bernard manning,who was about as funny as piles.:| us who like hatton for his exciting style, and his total dominance at 140,bring up the p4p shite becouse thats one of the 2 things all you haters ALWAYS pick up on,the other MAYWEATHER,change the record will ya:thumbsup
Why? The whole point of p4p is to judge fighters of different weights against each other. Because they can't fight each other on an even playing field. It makes no sense to start using multiple weight division success as a barometer. Loads of fighters are rated in the p4p lists without division hopping.
I watched it had no problem with what he said,if he wants to use that as a motivation so what i'm sure he couldn't give a flying **** what anyone on here thinks
All this P4P bollocks, put it to rest Ricky, will you? This is why I want Mayweather to return. Once Floyd returns & fights, the P4P debate will be no more!