Hatton : Pure Hype and Padded Record?

he's talked arse all through this sorry thread . cant believe its done 11 pages

 

There is no problem with padded record if the record is finally backed up. With only
lose to Mayweather (who else did not lose offiially against him?) and wins over
Tyszu, Corrales, Mallignagi - Hatton is right where he supposed to be with his record.

 

Wut a dumbass... Whoever started this thread. If Rick is such a loser & overhyped why does anyonee even want to fight him. The truth of the matter is Ricky has been a great fighter & a great attraction for boxng. He's been is some war & kept winning. You can't mistake 43 victories. To remain undefeated even on off nights is a feat in and of itself...

Every fighter has fluff on his Record. Truth is every big fight he's fought & won. From Tackie,Collazo, urango, JLc. TZU. & anybody can pick apart anybody's resume. People have said the manny's victories over morales & Barerra wern't big b/c the beat the hell out of each other first. So STFU w/ this madness & knock it of. Haaton has ten more fights than floyd & 7 more knockouts. Floyd's Rresume is light to me too. so is P williams. & a bunch of other guys. Nobody can say ricky ducked anybody or didn't take any risks or fought old guys or watied 19 yrs to come to US. He's a warrior. Knock it off.

 

If Floyd's resume is light to you, than Ricky's must be anorexic. Floyd's resume is much better than Ricky's.