Hatton says he would have to promote the Khan fight if it were to happen

:thumbsup

 

Of course we do because there are two dipshits by the name of Scurlantings and Betty (yet to post but he will), spouting nonsense about a good fighter in Hatton.

Soon there will be the usual ducking of Witter brought up again, even though Hatton has fought Tszyu, Mayweather, Pacquaio and Castillo a hell of alot better fighters than Witter....but he is scared of Junior 'shitter' Witter.atsch

Also they will be spouting the usual Witter is Mayweather with a punch

Same **** different day

 

Firstly im not a fanboy of Hatton but i give props where props are due.

Secondly you are talking logic when i called you on being a tosser because you never say anything good about Hatton, and wether your a fan or not he has had a good career, and you come back with the your mums a tosser

How old are you.......3,4,5,?

 

From them 4 fighters you claim were better than Witter

Tszyu - ok for arguements sake I will agree with you

Castillo - I disagree - he was shot to **** -

Mayweather and Pacquaio - Hatton fought them yes - but lets note he was also KO'd by both of them

So from them 3 fighters you listed better than Witter (I reject that version of Castillio was better)

I would agree he only beat Tsyzu - at his absolute peak performance of his career

So there is good reason to believe Witter could have be a real threat to beating Hatton

And with so little reward for it - Hatton had good reason to duck Witter

 

Thanks for sparing me your wrath (its Esther Baxter) but I've heard all the arguments before and its tedious.

You think the pro Hatton posters are fanboys who think he can do no wrong and they think you are a blind hater who won't give him his fair dues.

You say: Zoo practially retired
Reply: He KO'd Sharmbo Mitchell just 6 months before

You say: JLC was shot when he fought Hatton
Reply: He was ranked still in the P4P fighters.

You say: He got flattened both times in stepped up to Elite level
Reply: No shame in that, it was still genuine world class fighter and the man at 140

You say: Never for a top prime opponent
Reply: Malinaggi was number I contender and Urango was a champ and is still undefeated at 140.



Yadda, yadda, yadda....:roll:

Oh, and somewhere along the line you manage to fit in "shamelessly ducked", "brutally KO'd", "real boxing fans know.." and "his career was smoke and mirrors".

 

No your getting me wrong.

Im not saying Witter was ****....i name him shitter to anoy a few people:good

Witter had a decent career...Hatton had a better.

I dont believe Hatton was ever scared of Witter but the fight never made sense, due to US tv and ££££££.

The Tszyu win is severly underated.....my fav fighter of all time is Tszyu, a class act.

The Tszyu that Hatton beat would of beaten Witter and you have to remember whilst he had been out due to injury there was the destruction of Mitchell and there was once again the prospect of a DLH fight on the horizon.

As i say im not saying Witter would of had a chance of beating Hatton, i dont believe he would of, i think Hatton is a better fighter overall, but people like Scurlantings and Betty Swollocks are deliberatly underplaying and slandering a good British champion at every corner and the main reason is a so called "ducking" of Witter who's best ever win was against B level champions in Harris and Corley.

 

Well this fights dead in the water. Shame.

 

FAO Betty!!

 

The thread could do with putting out of its misery as well before the other Chuckle Brother chips in...

 

The point is that my perspective is the one which is based on cold, hard observable fact supported by most logical boxing fans. Yours is the illogical, twisted point based on meaningless assumptions which can never be proven and the somewhat irrational view that you're right while all the experts are wrong. I.e. Castillo (ring #1 and p4p #8) and Malignaggi (ring #1 generally recognised top contender) were garbage yet the likes of Holt, Torres, Witter etc... (ranked #3-#8) are brilliant just because they happen to be the guys he didn't fight. The silly twisted "logic" to try to explain the farcical claim that a guy who fought Tszyu, Castillo, Mayweather and Pacquiao is supposed to be afraid of a fighter who was nowhere near the level, yet should have entertained that fighter "just because he;s British". Go back to school kid, boxing ain;t your sport :hi::hi::hi::hi:

Now as a politican you might do down quite will. Dishonest, full of crap with a preconceived agenda and able to put a spin on anything!

 

Ricky Hatton said he wants to go on to be the worlds BEST promoter.... if he wnats to be an even average promoter he needs to learn that you can't say to guys like Frank Warren I'm not doing business with you!.... that's called cutting your nose off to spite your face! warren is the biggest UK promoter in the country and saying no to him means your saying no to alot of future fights involving your own fighters.... fights that Hatton can't afford to say no to at this very tender time in his promting career.

i don't see Hatton lasting long as a promoter, I don't think the Hatton's have the brains or experience.

 

..... but isn't Khan a free agent right now?

 

:huh

 

Khan would crack that eggy chin inside 3.

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LilRvt1lzEg