Hatton to fight 1 more fight before Mayweather

I have already posted an article like this.

Where does it say Hatton will fight one more fight?

The major issue is Hatton wants to have a home coming after having had 3 fights in America. Malignaggi and Floyd want it in America. M'Baye and Witter would do it in the UK.

I want Hatton to fight Witter and then Floyd. I just want him to put the Witter ghost to sleep. I'd like to see Floyd come back to 147 and beat Mosley and put that ghost to sleep. Then Hatton v Mayweather at 147 for all the marbles.

 

With Cotto facing the winner.

 

A Floyd-Mosley fight would derail all your hopes and dreams. That "ghost" would whip Floyds ass sending all your plans of a Hatton-Mayweather fight into the crapper.:yep

 

Come on Ricky, just fight Floyd...

If he must have one fight in between, he should go after Malignaggi.

 

Here is where it was said

I will add that we have heard this before. Hatton's pop said when Floyd offered him a fight a few years ago that hatton needed more fight, well its been like 4 and if he isnt ready now he want be ready then. Stalling, I would be shocked if this fight actaully happens, with Floyd taking all the blame.

 

Huh Shane Vs Floyd is not a minor fight in fact it would be considered bigger then Hatton Vs Floyd and shane would be considered a bigger threat then Hatton.

 

thank you. Shane would spank Hatton.

 

mosley vs floyd will be almost as big as dlh vs floyd

 

not only that Shane was considered the big man from 154 to 130 ..

 

This is the only report that has suggested Hatton would take another fight prior to fighting Mayweather. There was no direct quote from any party connected to Hatton that hinted at that either. It's doubtful that the Hatton camp would look to make a deal for a megafight and then jeopardise it by fighting someone inbetween.

So we should wait and see about this.

 

Congtratulations! You must be every newspapers editors dream!! Where are the direct quotes? The facts?

It must be true because:

a) its in a newspaper
and
b) it agrees with my opinion.

 

For **** sake, please let these guys confirm something.:yep

 

Christ!! Reading it again you've (mis) interpreted the entire article based on a small sentence in the middle.....unbelievable!!

 

No we just read what it said.