Hatton v Pac is for 'The Ring' Championship Belt

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Guy, Feb 25, 2009.


  1. Guy

    Guy Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,597
    0
    Dec 15, 2008
    “Hatton is The Ring champion, and as long as they both make weight, The Ring championship will be at stake,” the magazine’s editor in chief, Nigel Collins, told the Philippine Daily Inquirer .
    Pacquiao, The Ring’s top dog in the pound-for-pound class, held the magazine’s featherweight and junior lightweight belts in the past after defeating Mexicans Marco Antonio Barrera and Juan Manuel Marquez.
    Hatton will defend his Ring belt along with the fringe International Boxing Organization (IBO) belt against Pacquiao on May 2 at the MGM Grand Garden in Las Vegas.
     
  2. dangerousity

    dangerousity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,253
    2,301
    Jan 4, 2005
    Pac will be 3 time Ring belt Holder and 4 time Lineal all different weight divisions!
     
  3. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,373
    309
    Jan 8, 2009
    potential 7 division champ
    only fighter to win linear 112 and 130...and possibly 140 and 147
    best asian fighter all time
     
  4. Flea Man

    Flea Man มวยสากล Full Member

    82,426
    1,465
    Sep 7, 2008
    Pac will not win the linear 147 title IMO. Would have to beat Mosley to do that (or Cotto) and can't see either happening, although, to be honest Pac continues to surprise everyone so who knows?

    He certainly wasn't the 'Linear' LW champion!
     
  5. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,373
    309
    Jan 8, 2009
    bob arum would let pac fight cotto since cotto is on the verge of moving into other promotions and pac in close to retirement
     
  6. Taylex

    Taylex Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,885
    1
    Oct 15, 2007
    Calm down the Ring is just a magazine and not a proper sanctioning body.
     
  7. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,373
    309
    Jan 8, 2009
    the ring champ is most likely the one that is universally recognized
     
  8. roly

    roly Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,775
    8
    Aug 11, 2005

    but the ring belt has more legitimacy than the other alphabet bets.
     
  9. tolindoy

    tolindoy UBESTRIDTE MESTER Full Member

    6,396
    0
    Jan 22, 2009
    But why fighters would rather have the alphabet titles? If you haven't notice, challengers would call out the champs with the alphabet title, not the ring belt..
     
  10. Lee Mc

    Lee Mc Boxing Addict banned

    7,107
    3
    Jan 12, 2009
    The current Ring Belt holders have the following Alphabet belts...

    Ademek - IBF
    Pavlik - WBC, WBO
    Hatton - IBO
    Marquez - None
    Vazquez - WBC
    Calderon - WBO

    Only 3 of the 6 hold a major Alphabet title and yet all 6 are recogonised by most fans to be the best of their division or at least 2nd best. All of them are always called out.

    The Ring Magazine title is the hardest one to win as you have to beat the best.

    The WBC, for example, has the following as "World Champions"

    Giacobbe Fragomeni (Cruiser)
    Carl Froch (Super-Middle)
    Andre Berto (Welter)
    Timothy Bradley (Light-Welter)
    Humberto Soto (Super-Feather)
    Oscar Larios (Feather)
    Toshiaki Nishioka (Super Bantam)
    Daisuke Naito (Fly)
    Edgar Sosa (Light-Fly)
    Oleydong Sithsanerchai (straw)

    Now, there are some good names on there but how many do you regard as the best in their division? That's why the Alphabet titles don't matter anymore. The fans know it and so do the fighters.
     
  11. Nestea

    Nestea Thirst Remover Full Member

    7,336
    0
    Feb 25, 2008

    Your avy :hey :nut :admin
     
  12. roly

    roly Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,775
    8
    Aug 11, 2005
    fighters wouldn't rather have the alphabet belts, you're wrong about that.