Hatton v Pacquiao at risk says Hattons lawyer

Have to laugh at these Hatton loons that are talking about scared.

Manny Pacquiao is a modern marvel. He fought from flyweight to welterweight. He moved up two weight classes, from lightweight, where he had but one SINGLE fight to fight Oscar. Every single one of you idiots wrote him off as a no hoper in that fight, but me.

Then we have Ricky Hatton, moves up 7lbs, nearly gets KO'd by Collazo a non-puncher, and then KO'd brutally by Mayweather, who hadn't scored such a devastating KO in years. Then he whines about how its "not me natural weight".

Scared....ok....Hatton fans...:nut

 

I really don't know why people feel the need to lie and twist what happened in a fight to suit their own preconceived agenda. It really is rather disturbed. I'll be the first to say Mayweather was the better fighter and though the refereeing was terribly biased Hatton wouldn't have won in any case. However, putting up a decent show in losing late on to the p4p #1 in not embarrassign or shocking. It simply means you ran up against eh best fighter out there. Embarrassing/shocking see Woods v Tarver or Lockett v Pavlik.

 

You got your arsed kicked on that "great fighters step up in weight" BS a few weeks back. Give it up. You need to give it a miss with the insults, you're just coming across as a petulant child.

 

[QUOTE="TKO";3237511]I really don't know why people feel the need to lie and twist what happened in a fight to suit their own preconceived agenda. It really is rather disturbed. I'll be the first to say Mayweather was the better fighter and though the refereeing was terribly biased Hatton wouldn't have won in any case. However, putting up a decent show in losing late on to the p4p #1 in not embarrassign or shocking. It simply means you ran up against eh best fighter out there. Embarrassing/shocking see Woods v Tarver or Lockett v Pavlik.[/QUOTE]
The Ref terribly biased...now where have we heard that before? You guys kill me, I swear.

He didn't put up any decent show. He hit air. Sometimes he hit an elbow or an arm, but they were mostly flukes. Every time Mayweather opened up he hit him, he wore him down on the inside where Hatton is supposed be at his best. Then the pace slowed, and he brutally KO'd him. It was a one sided bore of a fight.

 

Hatton and his people being greedy and arrogant again...total ****s. They act like his opponents can't match him for fanbase.....well Manny can and a whole lot more....so get tae **** team Hatton.

 

can he ****, pacman might have alot of fans but not the saem type of fans, hattons fans go all over the world and pay the money to see him, hatton brings more money to the table than pacman.

 

you're right in that they are not the same type, Filipinos tend to have a brain.
and you're showing your ignorance again with those bollocks comments....about Hatton's shower bringing more to the table. I'll be in Manila for this one if it happens....there for a national party when Pac kicks **** out of Wicky.

 

Nobody has ever kicked my "arse" on this forum. People in the Brit forum have their heads too far up Hatton's ass to get sufficient oxygen to the brain in debates. I'm sorry, but that is how it is. Not unexpected in a Brit forum, but I keep it real.

I kicked everybodys arse when I told you Pacquiao could beat Hoya, and how he'll beat Hatton senseless. Your avatar would belong to me again, if I wanted it.

 

:good keeping it real us usual.

 

I'm sure you will. However, what those Filipinos and their party in Manila will contribute to the purse for the fight (which is the main issue when deciding how the split) is just a little unclear at the mo.

 

Betty Swollocks said Malignaggi would KO Hatton.

:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

so they have ppv in manilla or is the fight free on tv :huh

 

[quote="TKO";3237709]I'm sure you will. However, what those Filipinos and their party in Manila will contribute to the purse for the fight (which is the main issue when deciding how the split) is just a little unclear at the mo.[/quote]

ignorant, clueless....or both?

 

I said Malignaggi by stoppage at 16/1 was a good deal....not so sure it was having seen the fight.

 

No ****! Having seen the fight I've now decided Buster Douglas to stop Tyson at 42/1 was a great bet!