Hatton v Tszyu

What else would you called someone who starts new threads trying to discredit a guy's biggest win four years after it happened, creates aliases solely for the purpose of backing up his own criticisms and starts AT LEAST one thread every week (a lot more in the run up to one of his fights) dedicated solely to slating the fighter over something or other. Somebody who spends hours trawling the net for transcripts of his interviews in the hope of being able to make cheap criticisms over something or other which is completely irrelevant in the scheme of things )oh look he's talking in the third person again...)

The term hater describes someone who has an irrational and distorted dislike of someone based on illogical emotions (envy etc...) and will therefore automatically take the opposite perspective in everything in an attempt to do them down.

There are some objective fans who don't like his fighting style. Fair enough. Some find his interview style annoying or thing his opposition hasn't been all it could be. Again, fair enough. But when it gets to the stage of automatically taking the critical perspective and not only that but starting new threads especially for the purpose of creating new criticisms of the fighter and everyone around him (His girlfriend's tears aren't real, his mum's annoying, his brother doesn't deserve to be on the card, yadda yadda yadda) sorry but that is hating. I don't see how you can call it anything else. Even to the point of looking for hidden meanings in everything he does and making completelv baseless claims that his personality is fake.

You all know which poster's I mean, the OP; Scurla, Scar, ****** Betty, TFFP and there are another couple of dozen or so who definitely meet the "hater" description.

 

what eh,who why,are u taking the ****.
this is just like the gf,theres people on here who can't see through there hate filled glasses, ie haters,

even the diehard hatton fans will know he is not elite level,but top world class defo

the tread starter is one of the worst,i think hattons shagged his pet dog.
what do u call people who always say hatton can't fight,(which he can)can't box,just hugs and holds,and has been lucky never to have been disqualified for all his fouling,mate these people are one of two things

1 haters of the worst kind

2 know **** all about boxing:hi:

 

The main reason Hatton gets criticised is the gaping chasm between reality and what comes out of his mouth.

 

Ah!! So THATS why we're discussing a 4 year old fight for the 799th time???

 

I meant that we should be a little more articulate.

 

hold on,are you my old RE teacher from barden,Mr Bass.

sorry mate only joking,unfortunately my volcabuary consists of building trade banter:good

 

One of the dirtiest performances of all time. Hatton needed everything in his favour that night to win..and even then it was very tight when old Tszyu quit...Wicky was behind before that final and deliberate crushing low blow in the 8th or so.

in the lead up to the Pacman fight

'I'm not saying i'm the best fighter of all time (gee Wicky...that's really humble of you...cheers for that)..but if I can be remembered as one of the best them i'll be happy with that'
:roll:

 

The referee helped Hatton win the fight, if not for the ref Hatton would have lost the fight. He was very dirty, was holding, head butting, etc.

 

That quote was actually "I'm not saying I'm the best British boxer of all time, but if I can be remembered as one of the best I'll be happy...."

Just when I thought your credibility of this subject couldn't get any worse....atsch

 

Where would you rank him in terms of British fighters..... inside or outside the top 10?

I could probably find a place for him in there.....

 

I think he'd sneak in at 9 or 10, maybe just fail to make it at 11 or 12. I suppose a big part is what you rank on. He's actually accomplished quite a lot as far as a British boxer is concerned but people will use stuff like "skillsets" to justify a lower ranking.....

 

Try his credibility on any f***ing subject!!!