Hatton vs Cotto prime for prime at 140, who wins?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Rob887, Jul 31, 2011.


  1. GOW7

    GOW7 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,285
    5
    Aug 16, 2010
    Hatton by decision . Hatton's pace and pressure would be too much for front running Cotto.
     
  2. GOW7

    GOW7 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,285
    5
    Aug 16, 2010
    Thats all great but Cotto is a one handed fighter. Ricky would take Cotto in deep waters and drown his lazy sitting on ropes ass.
     
  3. JMP

    JMP Champion Full Member

    18,768
    21
    Dec 5, 2007
    Hatton by decision at 140 imo. Cotto by knockout at 147.
     
  4. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    Cotto would kick the living **** out of Hatton, even if the fight were held in Manchester. That's assuming we're not talking about the weight drained Cotto towards the end of his time at 140. There's no amount of holding and hitting that could save him. In fact, Ricky would get ****ing stretched, in his prime he doesn't look nearly as proficient as Cotto in his pro debut.

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-lC-ERQXHFI[/ame]
     
  5. Goro

    Goro Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,523
    0
    Feb 18, 2011
  6. Bogotazo

    Bogotazo Amateur Full Member

    31,381
    1,133
    Oct 17, 2009
    Cotto knocked out Torres, who had him in the most trouble prior to Margarito by far, with a huge right hand that bent his body all the way back. Not sure what you mean by lazy, Cotto always fought back in the trenches pre-Margarito. There was a period at welterweight where he barely threw it, but at 140 and now post-surgery it has been a weapon of effectiveness. Not to mention the fact that Hatton's right was never exactly a game-changer itself.
     
  7. Kayo-Kid

    Kayo-Kid Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,286
    0
    Aug 13, 2009
    Ask urself, hw wuld Hatton have faired against Torres that fought Cotto @ 140?
     
  8. rayrobinson

    rayrobinson Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,656
    706
    Dec 8, 2009
    Hatton was alot quicker than Cotto at 140.

    Also lets remember a prime Hatton was 4 years prior to the Pacquiao demolition.
     
  9. Colpolite

    Colpolite Guest

    Pacquiao would've demolish Hatton regardless if it's his prime or whatever because of that face first no head movement brawling type.
     
  10. Hitman-Fan

    Hitman-Fan Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,431
    1
    May 27, 2009
    At 140 Hatton takes a UD

    At 147 Hatton gets Ko'd
     
  11. des3995

    des3995 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,903
    126
    Oct 23, 2009
    It's easy to forget that Cotto was a destructive body puncher himself.

    I say Cotto by KO/TKO, but not without some dicey moments.
     
  12. Finesse74

    Finesse74 Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,016
    1
    Jul 28, 2010
    Cotto was unstoppable in his prime at 140 lbs.
    I love both fighters, but Cotto was more of destructive force than Hatton was at ANY weight.

    Hatton was a good pressure fighter, but Cotto would be would the bigger, stronger and hard puncher in the ring.
     
  13. Post Box

    Post Box I'm back too, bitches Full Member

    14,484
    3
    Oct 12, 2010
    I think Cotto has issues with Hattons constant pressure at 140 and Ricky grinds out a UD. Its a style thang yo
     
  14. puertorricane

    puertorricane Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,242
    3
    Jan 25, 2010
    Cotto by tko or ko easily

    :hat
     
  15. Royal-T-Bag

    Royal-T-Bag Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,661
    4
    Jan 6, 2008
    I rate Hatton higher but head to head Cotto wins for sure.