Hatton went up and fought number 1 p4p Mayweather what's different with brook?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Jimmy!, Jul 10, 2016.


Page 3 of 3
  1. acie2g

    acie2g Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,738
    1,302
    Jul 21, 2010
    I didn't say it was bad or good, I think GGG fans like with every situation are trying to give him a pass for being a flip flopping hypocrite making excuses for why he makes sh!tty fights. Credit should go to Brook even though other fighters would fight GGG for that same purse. I also think its embarrassing that in your opinion the so called #1 P4P #1's best opponent is a hype job Welter.
     
    acie2g, Jul 10, 2016
    acie2g, Jul 10, 2016
    #31
  2. MVC!

    MVC! The Best Ever Full Member

    60,129
    5,611
    Nov 5, 2013
    What's on point is the fact that this is actually quite a fraudulent fight, and a money grabbing one to boot. It's as bad as you can get and all boxing fans know it. :nono

    Floyd vs Hatton was a legacy defining fight for both men.

    This is a money defining fight for both men. :D
     
    MVC!, Jul 10, 2016
    MVC!, Jul 10, 2016
    #32
  3. Jimmy!

    Jimmy! Guest

    its not a great fight legacy wise but it will be more competitive then people think im sure

    wouldn't you agree brook vs canelo for example would be a 50-50 fight?

    especially the canelo that looked lost until he stopped glass chinned khan?

    I would personally favour thurman and spence and brook to beat Canelo at 154 in a close fight but thats just me.
     
    Jimmy!, Jul 10, 2016
    Jimmy!, Jul 10, 2016
    #33
  4. Jimmy!

    Jimmy! Guest

    MVC you really underrating Brook here

    Brook would give Canelo huge problems and beat him on points all khan was missing against him was some size and chin and power brook has much more in all departments.
     
    Jimmy!, Jul 10, 2016
    Jimmy!, Jul 10, 2016
    #34
Page 3 of 3