Hatton winding down his career

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Betty Swollocks, May 3, 2008.


  1. SleazeNation

    SleazeNation Coal Black Horse Full Member

    2,106
    0
    Nov 10, 2007
    Manny. He's already proven he's the best at 140. Let's see him in the biggest fights now.
     
  2. ThePlugInBabies

    ThePlugInBabies ♪ ♫ Full Member

    8,673
    101
    Jan 27, 2007
    :rofl

    hatton crushes manny, brutally. it's a mismatch that pacman can't and won't win.
     
  3. SleazeNation

    SleazeNation Coal Black Horse Full Member

    2,106
    0
    Nov 10, 2007
    Come on, you'd love to see Hatton-Pacquiao. Nobody wouldn't tune in for that ****.
     
  4. ThePlugInBabies

    ThePlugInBabies ♪ ♫ Full Member

    8,673
    101
    Jan 27, 2007
    compared to witter-hatton? no thanks.

    if it went ahead though maybe on the undercard we could have DLH-calzaghe and haye-pavlik.

    you know, some more equal, legacy making matches that actually count for something.
     
  5. SleazeNation

    SleazeNation Coal Black Horse Full Member

    2,106
    0
    Nov 10, 2007
    Well, they are talking about De La Hoya-Pacqiuao after he fights Hatton.
     
  6. Beatboxer

    Beatboxer Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,937
    2
    Mar 4, 2006
    Understand that your dealing with one of the biggest morons p4p on ESB here mate.

    Hes public enemy number 1 on these boards. If you look through this thread, you will see numerous examples of his hypocrisy.
     
  7. SleazeNation

    SleazeNation Coal Black Horse Full Member

    2,106
    0
    Nov 10, 2007
    Because I don't agree with your view of Hatton?

    I've seen him prove he's the best at 140 for the last 3 years and fighting Witter would do nothing more than prove it again. I don't see how it's an essential fight that must be made at this stage. There are other options for him. Witter has none.
     
  8. ThePlugInBabies

    ThePlugInBabies ♪ ♫ Full Member

    8,673
    101
    Jan 27, 2007
    legacy wise witter is the one that does most for him and let's face it, hatton isn't in the sort of position that calzaghe finds himself in where his legacy is secure and he can just go after the ££££££££. hatton's legacy is shaky...
     
  9. SleazeNation

    SleazeNation Coal Black Horse Full Member

    2,106
    0
    Nov 10, 2007
    Hatton's opponents > Calzaghe's
     
  10. ThePlugInBabies

    ThePlugInBabies ♪ ♫ Full Member

    8,673
    101
    Jan 27, 2007
    calzaghe's wins > hatton's wins.
     
  11. SleazeNation

    SleazeNation Coal Black Horse Full Member

    2,106
    0
    Nov 10, 2007
    Calzaghe has no win as good as Kostya Tszyu.
     
  12. Beeston Brawler

    Beeston Brawler Comical Ali-egedly Full Member

    46,399
    15
    Jan 9, 2008
    I would have them about equal to be honest.

    Most of Joe's endless meaningless defences of the WBO were comparable to the endless meaningless defences made by Hatton.

    Since they both stepped up to the plate, I would still say it is about par.

    Tzsyu > Ashira
    Maussa < Lacy
    Collazo > Bika
    Urango > Manfredo
    Castillo < Kessler
    Mayweather > Hopkins
    Lazcano < Jones?

    4-3 to Hatton for me!
     
  13. onourway

    onourway Haye KTFO1 Wlad Full Member

    5,774
    3
    Mar 31, 2008
    Legacy wise the best win for Hatton is....PAC.

    When people mentioned Hopkin's resume, does he get more credit for De La Hoya/Trinidad or Eastman?

    Beating the P4P#2 even if he has come through the weights beats more than beating a no mark like Witter.

    It's quite obvious what happens after Hatton beats Witter. "Oh well, I knew he'd win, I just wanted to see him finally do it, he took his time, who has Witter fought, why was he so scared for so long?" etc.
     
  14. scurlaruntings

    scurlaruntings ESB 2002 Club Full Member

    35,621
    12
    Jul 19, 2004
    Utterly stunning logic. This forum never ceases to amaze me.
     
  15. onourway

    onourway Haye KTFO1 Wlad Full Member

    5,774
    3
    Mar 31, 2008
    Which part do you disagree with?