Haugen, Mancini, Paz: Rank them, please.

1.Mancini
2. Haugen
3. Paz

Mancini lost to Haugen but that was a full ten years after Mancini's prime and it was after a three year layoff for Mancini. I also think Mancini should have got the decision against Camacho but lost via split decision. Mancini in his prime would have run over Haugen imo.

 

This ranking makes the most sense to me.

 

Mancini
Haugen


Pazienza

 

Love the big gap putting Pazienza waay lower, as it should be.

 

agreed.

 

Yes sir!
TBH couldn't stand him when he was an active fighter lol

 

Same as you, but I had Haugen winning all three Pazienza fights.

 

I had him winning all 3 as well

 

Mancini
Haugen
Paz

Mancini burned out fast but I can't see Haugen lasting into the 14th round with a prime Arguello

 

I love you all so much.

 

Haugen



Mancini
























Paz

 

Hard to rate the highest between Mancini and Haugen,but I'm going with his list.

Haugen:he was the least talented out of the three but made the most out of it,upsetting some good fighters and he only got ko'ed a bit past it by Chavez.


Mancini:the thing that will always get me about him is that he lasted until 14 vs Arguello,but because he didn't beat him and Haugen also did similar lasting 15 with Whitaker,I'll rate Mancini slightly lower,but he was a human tornado that's always relentless,quick and powerful.














Paz:he got talent,he got balls,but most importantly he's the worst when it comes to resume.

 

1. Greg Haugen. He was the most skilled. He had boxing skills that were more subtle like avoiding his opponents jab with a half step. Counterpunching, accuracy

2. Ray Mancini was the strongest, most aggressive.


3. Vinny Pazienza was a wannabe Camacho. Man lost practically every round against 44 year old Roberto Duran in 1994. Somehow he walks out with another decision. That happened too often.