So you are saying Roach is talking **** then having been quoted saying all of the **** i said. I can live with Roach talking ****:good The problem your argument has is that a certain someone has agreed NOW to both MAY and MARCH. The world is waiting PAC:bbb
if its really in May then it will be agreed. trust me. Pac will sign it soon as Arum bends over infront of him. he will be arriving in manilla soon for Pac to sign. if its 50/50 then why not. Unless floyd agreed for 60/40 in his favour as usuall then its a no deal, no matter what the date is.
Money shouldn't be an issue. Reportedly, Arum is happy with the amount of money Mayweather is receiving. I doubt he would hatch out a deal with Schaefer and then fly over to the Phillipines if the money issue didn't look good.
your a douchebag.. Hatton challenged Mayweather.. therefore he is the one that needs to move up in weight. Same thing with Marquez. If Hopkins wanted to challange Vtali tomorrow are you going to expect Vtali to come down to Hopkins weight?? please leave the posting to people who actually know about boxing..
So true. Especially with Arum's dislike of Floyd you know the money split is good for Pac. Prolly 50/50
:good :goodThat's why I said these promoters are applying Psy-Ops. They know that fans will get all worked up with these types of shenanigans. Well, at least the uneducated fans. I believe it when I see it. I call it RUMINT (Rumor Intel), LOL. However, in all seriousness all the hype and delay will make this fight even bigger. We also have to understand that Pacman will impose his will, and he will stir things up like he always does. The fight will happen eventually, but not soon enough for the boxing fanatics.
The information about Mayweather agreeing to terms was reported by numerous reputable sources including, ESPN, Sports Illustrated, Yahoo, and the Los Angelos Times. It's more than just a rumor if these sources are reporting it. With that said, it's ironic that you would call fans who believe these sources to be unedcuated considering the history of reliability of the afformentioned the sources.