Thank you! It takes balls to enter the ring against any pro. Sure, some challenges are better than others, but "coward" is just a ridiculous word to use for a fighter. Same with "bum." I pretty much always root against Haye, but he's still no coward.
Thompson is a way better opponent than Audley. Also Wlad beat him a few years ago but even nowadays he is more dangerous than A-Farce.
I agree. Thompson is better than Audley, and has a better chin. BoxRec Rankings Tony Thompson: 8 Audley Harrison: 41 ESPN Top 10 Rankings Tony Thompson: 9 Audley Harrison: not ranked
c'mon surely we all want audley to do a job on haye !!!!!!lets get out of the closet YES WE CAN !!!!!!!!
How you gonna tell me that with a stright face? Audley has won a Gold Medal, and is the European Champion .
T THATS what i mean! ''ALSO wlad beat him years ago''. Like thats supposed to elevate him. or like thats an accomplishment! SO what if wlad beat him years ago?! wlads beating everyone! What the ff has thompson achieved as a boxer??!? Audley won olympic gold and european champion. That doesnt make him a world beater. That doesnt make him a top 10 fighter. But hes still achieved more than Thompson has.
exactly. At the end of the day. Wlad can call haye a COWARD. Coz Wlad has the balls to step in the ring. Us lazy ESB posters cant call anyone a coward or any1 a BUMM! Liar is one thing. But no boxer is a coward or a bumm
it does mean something. It means audley has the size the weight and the skill. And if audley can get his game together, haye is in trouble. We havent seen evidence of that in a long long time. Nor is there any reason to believe its gonna happen. But that doesnt mean it CANT happen. Its boxing after all. Dont rule Audley out
Those are dick head ratings. Those are ratings from biased American boxing media for the sensationalism of American fighters.
No, you're wrong. They are actually two different ratings systems. BoxRec is a statistical rating system, like the BCS college football ratings. ESPN.com is Dan Rafael's ratings. However, you can't really call it "biased American boxing media", when they have Haye at #3. They have a negative bias towards Harrison, but not Haye? I don't think so....