Haye 198. Enzo 197

Yeah I thought we were getting dragged away from the real thread.

 

I said it's part of the UK, I didn't say you were British. You did not bombard me, you started the bombarding. If you never mentioned Cunningham, UK posters wouldn't have jumped down my throat.

 

We probably would, but on a different thread especailly if it was to do with JC and Hopkins.

 

Well that is ok.

You wouldnt say there was baiting there? You dont expect a response from people when you that kind of thing? :blood

Come on now Reg stop playing the why is everybody attacking me card.

 

Wait a minute, you're the one who baited me. I submitted that post in response to you saying Haye would dismantle Cunningham.

 

He's playing this card so he gets that response and is desired effect is to criticise our different opinions.

 

I did bait you, . I also said I would love to see it. Not that it would happen.

But one post is not bombarding, the bombarding only happend after you responded :good.

 

Don't get involved, but if he again annoys you just mention the beating jones give hopkins at middlweight that may make him back off.

 

Clearly you didn't see that fight. If you did wouldn't describe what happened as a beating.

 

I only responded as such because of your initial baiting comments

 

Sorry beatings the wrong word winning a UD then is that better.

 

Here man, I dont care that this thread has went this way, .

However, if you dont want to get "attacked" dont get involved at all. :good

 

Very sound advice:good

 

I didn't realize how sensitive European boxing fans were. You make innocent comments and they go off. I don't even bother participating in Wlad threads anymore. I really don't even like to mention Cotto because of his sensitive fans.

 

Well one would be a gross exaggeration of what actually took place, the other would be the correct result. You didn't see the fight, you just simply looked up the result on boxrec. Just admit it, it's no big deal.