Haye and Wlad are both at fault but not equally

Haye said he renegotiated his contract with Sauerland. That may be true but if Sauerland have a percentage of Haye's next fight earnings I cannot believe they agreed to sign that away. Why would they do that? So, in other words, Sauerland still have a percentage of Haye's next fight. Haye did not deny that in that interview, he just said he renegotiated his deal with them. Sauerland are still going to get a slice of the pie...

 

There is no defence for Wlad fighting Chisora. He knew it would kill the Haye fight and that's why he did it.

Wlad is a fraud and a coward. Plain and simple.

 

so why isn't Haye fighting Vitali instead? Vitali wants it, Haye wants the Klitschkos, so why not go Vitali and then Wlad? Even if it takes dropping belts just to avoid meaningless mandatory defences it should be workable

 

The fight will always be on the table. There's nothing that says Haye has has to retire, that's his decision , not the Klitschko's. Would you retire if you knew you were close, and in the near future to having 1, 2 , or possible a trio of fights if he wins one, where you could make 20+ million per. Whats he rushing of to , winning an Oscar, please.. although i can think of another Londoner who did.

 

vlad fighting chisora is a joke. no excuse. I just cant accept that vlad would take that fight and then fight haye july 2nd. Thats BS. Vlad is at fault for this not happening.

 

Wlad is a coward

 

Then why didn't Haye sign with Wlad for July 2nd just to call Wlad's bluff? deal:deal

 

At the end of the day there is still no reason Haye cannot sign to fight Vitali.

 

Vlad has no defence. His fighting chisora full well knowing it puts the Haye fight off. Derek Chisora FFS.

 

Thats not the point, it was renegotiated so he Wlad could get 50/50, it was another thing Haye did to get the fight to happen.

All Wlad has to do is not fight Chisora and we can see the mega fight

Over to Wlad.....

 

This is EXACTLY my thinking too. Don't understand why Haye won't sign.

 

Haye/Wlad is the one most want to see, both prime, the ones who have called each other out for a couple years.

If Haye fights Vitali the Wlad fight never happens whether he wins or loses.

He beats Vitali then Wlad certainly wont want any of Haye and if he loses what would be the point?

 

Haye could have fought Vitali and chose Valuev. A much easier fight.
Haye could have fought Wlad but pulled out due to injury.
Chisora= better then AFRAUD.

Simple. Haye don't retire. He hasn't even had 30 fights yet.
It's not the same as saying I wont fight my sibling. It's an easy adjustment one can make
Haye is just lucky the WBA was corrupted by D.King , to give Valuev his title back after Chageav beat him for it , and then lost it to Wlad.

Never seen a champion in recess come back from retirement win a fight, then get the unification for the interim and champion in recess fight canceled, end up fighting the other real champ(Wlad) on two weeks notive after Valuev and King refused, and then be stripped of his belt. How exactly did Valuev retain that belt. And why is it all of a sudden that Chagaev is now able to fight for the belt again. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. Very weird... Maybe they didn't want Klitschko's to have all the belts. Don't see why the loser of the first fight(Chageav/Valuev) would be able to defend the WBA belt against someone who had accomplished nothing at heavyweight(Haye), and the winner of the first fight not have the belt on the line against the best in the division.

 

He'd have to fight in May/June if the Wlad fight isnt the next fight, aren't you getting that.

Haye agreed to July 2nd as did Sky and everyone else, then Wlad ****ed it up by insisting on fighting Chisora first in April for no good reason as of yet.

 

Its no use, this^^^ is the kind of person we are dealing with when it comes to the Klit fans atsch