Haye as fast as Chambers or Bird??...not!!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by bretchko, Jun 19, 2011.


  1. rapidfire

    rapidfire Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,655
    2
    Jun 17, 2007
    The difference between Byrd and Chambers and Haye is that Haye actually is someone with some offense. Both Chambers and Byrd were defensively minded due to the fact that they don´t posess much power. Now Haye is completely different, he has that power along with his speed, that makes him so explosive and therefor more dangerous for Wlad. I´m not saying he will beat Wlad, but it´s obvious for me that his chances of upsetting Wlad are much better than those of a defensive minded fighter.
     
  2. Wig

    Wig Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,785
    4,229
    May 31, 2010
    My Granddad is faster than fat eddie chambers, and he's been dead for sixteen years.
     
  3. chico g

    chico g Let's watch some Sesame Street...lmao Full Member

    10,913
    12,287
    Oct 18, 2008
    Chamber's style is all wrong for a quick fighter. He should have concentrated on movement, and mobility in the Wlad fight. Not standing still in spots, with the high guard....
     
  4. EJDiaZ

    EJDiaZ Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,213
    422
    Aug 21, 2010
    Haye is faster than Chambers and Bryd and Valuev
     
  5. Jack

    Jack Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,560
    68
    Mar 11, 2006
    Anyone who says Chambers is faster than Haye clearly hasn't seen either fight that much. If it wasn't for Chambers' nickname, nobody on ESB would ever mention his speed and it annoys me that so many people seem to think he's actually fast. He isn't. That's purely ignorant based solely on his nickname. He may be faster than some horrifically slow heavyweights but that doesn't then mean that he's fast. His hand speed is average at best yet you go into any thread about him and you'll always see people say "He has great hand speed". That's nonsense.

    Someone like Larry Holmes, who isn't noted for his speed, was faster than him. Guys like Frazier or Dempsey, who also aren't noted for their speed, were faster punchers.

    I guess that's why people have nicknames though. There will always be gullible ****s who'll go onto BoxRec, see that a guy is fast and then come on ESB with "GUYS, CHAMBERS IS FASTER THAN TISON OR ALY!". If Andre Ward decides to get rid of "Andre 'S.O.G' Ward" and replaces it with "Andre 'This twat punches like a mule kicks' Ward", people will lap it up.

    Chambers is an average fighter with average speed. If he ever looks fast, it's because his opponents do a good imitation of rigor mortis not because he actually is.
     
  6. anarci

    anarci Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,237
    64
    Jul 21, 2009
    Haye is faster than Chambers.... I dont think hes as fast on his feet as Byrd or has his legs, but his hand speed is close or on par with Byrds.
     
  7. Kissan

    Kissan I respect box Full Member

    1,368
    261
    Mar 1, 2010
    OT: I just re-watched Wlad-Byrd I. Wlad has damn powerful hands. The left hook that shook Byrd in the 9th was beautiful and so was the first knockdown. Two hard left hands and then the right one to the side of Byrds head. And I kinda find Byrds bird annoying. I love it how she screams when Wlad hits Byrd powerfully (no sado).
    Byrd was a stinker back then. I actually liked him in the second fight. Didn't he become an active christ back then?
     
  8. Hellion

    Hellion Active Member Full Member

    738
    0
    Nov 14, 2008
    Jack, why do you say that Larry Holmes wasn't noted for his speed? In his jab was specifically noted for it's speed and the way he could drop the right in after it could be blurring, maybe not as fast as Ali, but a damn sight faster than most around today.

    Even when he was 947 years old her was pretty quick. Take a look

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3UhDuYElHEA
     
  9. kriszhao

    kriszhao Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,913
    2,173
    Feb 8, 2008
  10. globenerd

    globenerd Guest

    Check again. No one's saying Chambers is faster than anyone you mentioned, just faster than Haye, who himself is nowhere near on par with anyone you mentioned.
    If Haye had taken the non-hype, BS-my-way-to-a-big-money-fight, road, and actually fought legit HW contenders, he would've lost to Chambers.
    Chambers > Haye
     
  11. Peter Brit

    Peter Brit Member Full Member

    468
    0
    Jun 4, 2010
    Chambers is not faster than Haye and he is a lot smaller. He came in at 208 against Wladimir, which is an average fight weight for a cruiser. However they do not have a tyre round the waist. Chambers could make lightheavy.

    Why did wladimir not walking through this fat lightheavy.
     
  12. Peter Brit

    Peter Brit Member Full Member

    468
    0
    Jun 4, 2010
    Ask yourself how could Adamek is a lot trimmer round the waist than Eddie when he is ten pounds heavier. In Adamek shape Eddie is may be just about 200, yet he fights as a heavy.
     
  13. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    Bingo! Score another one for 'Bama..................:thumbsup
     
  14. HENDO

    HENDO Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,075
    6
    Mar 20, 2010
    :lol:

    This **** was hilarious.
     
  15. bballchump11

    bballchump11 2011 Poster of the Year Full Member

    63,174
    24
    Oct 27, 2010