thanks for shedding light on this but of course using Hayes theory Haye Jnr would no doubt knock DeGale out in the pro's :nut
It doesn't matter how he looks, only how Groves looks. Warren's never cared how stupid he looks, he even claimed he'd retire if Haye ever beat Enzo.......then of course he didn't.
I doubt that would have any bearing on what Haye says. Apparently he hasn't spoken to his brother for years. We're not talking about the Hattons here. I doubt he's bitter about any of James' losses.
Two points here.... 1. Haye is right when he says the amatuer and pro ranks are completely different. 2. It does sound as though Haye is a little jealous when taking the overall interview into account. He sounds a bit like Dana White when people comment on other fighter who arent his UFC fighters.
The thing is DeGale isn't even in the pro game and looks likely to stay on for 2012. If Haye wants to go the snide promoting way of Frank Warren then that is up to him but I thought he was better than that. Warren is one of the biggest ****s on planet earth aswell just thought I would add that :smoke
I think Degale will turn pro, he mentions money a lot. He'll be 26 after London, thats not too old but it doesn't leave much wriggle room for injuries or loses on the way up if you're going to win a world title and get out a decent age.
Nothing wrong with what Haye is saying. Degale is not very impressive and will be found out soon in the pro ranks. I also stated in a previous post that the Irish lad Sutherland would beat degale in the pro ranks, so maybe Haye is reading my posts. If Haye is reading my posts then come on sign up Choi Tseveenpurev.
So you have never heard of the super-confident/arrogant boxer stereotype before? I take it you are not a fan of Ali?