Haye " Im giving Vitali until the end of summer"

I don't know, that footage of David Haye yelling "NOW!" right before the final flurry seemed a tad obvious to most.

 

Here you do again. You can't help yourself - this is just the most archetypal Klittard post one could wish to read. It's almost like a spoof.

To dissect part 1 of the **** you just spouted: You try to justify Charr's shot at Vitali saying at least he was active - well Haye was pretty active in the lead up to the Wlad fight, but I suppose you're applying different rules because you don't like the guy. He was also the former undisputed CW champion and had moved up to HW and picked up a title (albeit a paper one, but still one that Wlad wanted) setting up a unification fight. Now, you say that was a fight he got for doing nothing; perhaps you can explain what Mormeck or Wach did that was any better than that?

Now for the best bit of your post: 'Why should he get shot #2' :rofl. You do realise that the Klitschos are two entirely different fighters, and that Haye has only fought one of them, right? One of them is the HW champ of the world, the other is just a titlist and ranked #2 in the division. Please explain how in boxing losing to the champion somehow prohibits you from fighting the number to ranked guy, especially when you have just beaten his last opponent in more convincing fashion than he did.

Andre Ward if the SMW Champ. Carl Froch is the #2 ranked guy and a titlist. If a guy loses to Ward, but then comes back and demolishes Froch's last opponent does this mean he can't get a fight with Froch because he was beat by the champ? What is Froch has been telling anyone who listens how he wants to knock the guy out?

Boxing isn't a tag team sport.

 

Reasons to see this fight.

1. Interesting style matchup

2. Even fight

3. Number 3 HW, vs number 2 HW

4. Bad blood between the two fighters

5. Haye bettered Vitalis effort over Chisora, which again adds intrigue to the fight from the fans perspective


REASONS NOT TO SEE THE FIGHT

1. I don't like David Haye

 

If you haven't seen it I apologise. I replied to your post a page or so back.

 

Haye the #3 heavyweight

 

1. Yes he was dull against Valuev. That's the consensus.

2. Boxing isn't a tag team sport.

3.a. Boxing isn't a tag team sport.

b. True, but Wlad didn't spend a year calling out Charr and telling interviewers how he wants to fight and knock out him out after the Vitali fight had already beaten him, did he.

 

he sounds like a whining girl who wants a phone call

**** he would rather fight after summer so he is older

 

Course he is, if you want to disagree lets forget that argument and call him the 9th best HW in the world

Povetkin is fighting Wlad, or another bum

Adamek has already been beaten by Vitali

Arreola has already been beaten by Vitali

Eddie Chambers fights at Cruiserweight

Who else do you rank above him

 

That's the way I see it.

 

Fighters talking **** is just exactly that. Take it with grains of sand. I didn't say boxing is a tag team sport but it's not about getting instant title shots either. Haye needs to earn another chance.

Beating Chisora just isn't good enough

 

It doesn't matter, with this guy his opinions are formed solely around if he likes a guy or not.

 

Not in my top 15 at heavyweights at all.

http://murmuringsofaboxingmad-man.b...my-top-15-heavyweights-in-world-jan-2013.html

 

:rofl

Dumb or trolling. Can't tell which.

I'll post this AGAIN and perhaps one of you people can actually come back with some kind of reply instead of disappearing from the thread or ignoring it. Wishful thinking, I know.

Here you go:

I won't hold my breath.

 

David had a contact after negotiating... he didnt sign and ONCE AGAIN wants to change a deal... even if Vitali said "I want to fight David Haye" if the deal cant get done, you move on... simple as that

But many ppl think that because Vitali said "I want David Haye", Vitali should do whatever Haye wants to get the fight... it doesnt work like that:deal

 

I don't have a problem with Haye making money. The guy clearly knows how to do that. He made a mint from the Valuev,Harrison, and Wlad fights. I am glad for him.

What I do hate is the sense of Entitlement he has that he thinks he can snap his fingers and get a title shot.

Here is the David Haye Plan of making money:

Go on British TV and say how he is going to savagely KO someone. Get the fight made finally after many back and forth negotiations over silly crap that doesn't matter. At the Press Conference tells of how he is a murderous puncher and he is going to put the guy in a coma and knock his head off. Tells us he is going to put on an exciting fight and don't blink because it will be over. Tells us again he is going to knock the guy out in savage and embarrassing fashion. Brits come on ESB and parrot all of Haye's talk. They actually think he is telling the truth.

Fight night gets here and Haye won't engage, back peddles, throws 10 punches a round, flops, looks at the referee when he gets punched in the face like something illegal was done, back peddles some more and the fight is over.

After the fight he blames his performance on his 'broken hand' or 'broken pinky toe' and says he would have won by KO otherwise.

Wash. Rinse. Repeat. It is like he reads from the same script for each fight.

I don't hate David Haye or even dislike him. He is just annoying. I think Booth is a very good trainer and showed class in interviews after the Wlad fight where he basically said "we had a plan and it didn't work David couldn't get to him" etc.

I don't have any interest in sitting through a fight again where Haye is going to be at physical disadvantages and is just going to try and survive. It is pointless.