Wow more great logic, difference being everyone knew Chisora won that fight. Vitali beat Chisora comfortably, see the difference? ****ing hell atsch
That is your logic. The actual result is what matters. The person asked you why isn't Haye challenging the younger fighter instead of a 40 year old man who looks the worst he has ever looked. You reply he won the fight, same thing applies here, Hellaneus won the fight.
Christ are you serious? What is so hard to understand? Helenius was awarded the fight yes but that means **** when everyone saw him lose with their own eyes. Vitali chose Chisora because he thought he won the fight like anyone who knows boxing does. Had helenius deserved to win vitali would of rather fight him. We dont give a **** if the corrupt judges gave Helenius the fight, in most peoples eyes he lost. Vitali was awarded the decision vs Chisora and everybody agress with that decision. See the slight difference? If vitali was awarded the win and most people thought chisora won you would have a point but that clearly didnt happen. I dont think i can possibly dumb it down for you anymore. Sigh
he didn't unify all the CW belts, he never had Adamek's IBF belt but as a HW, losing to Wlad very widely on points doesn't make him God to demand a title shot and a huge payday from Vitali under the excuse "Vitali said he can knock me out"
I think this fight will happen in A or 2 years. Remember that : Haye and Klitshcko were agree for %, contracts were signed but few days before the D-day, the fight is cancelled and they fighted last summer. Haye is a cheater : if he win he will be very proud but if he loses he will says that he is injuried as last summer or it's because he was retired for too long, everybody knows that Haye have a big mouth but do a little. I think Haye is thinking about all that before signing the contracts. And I see Vitali winning the fight by KO in 10th round because Haye will fight hard and because he is proud but Vitali is strongest, better and greatest than Haye. What do you think about that?
I'm using your logic, whether the people feel Chisora won or not, he has a L by his name. He lost the fight. For you to claim that its ok for Haye to fight Vitali instead of working his way up to Vitali by at the least fighting Chisora, because Chisora lost, would be an attack against Vitali for fighting the loser of Helenius vs. Chisora. I'll also add, Haye didn't win his last fight either.
atsch do people really think this? cunningham was scrapping it out for a meaningless vacated title that really belonged to a guy haye beat. he's a paper champion who picked up a vacant title twice & has only ever had TWO successful title defences in a threadbare division where all the best fighters have gone up to hw. what a monster. you may as well say floyd is "running away" from senchenko.
vitali is a big name & a great fighter. chisora isn't. can you imagine the stick haye would get if he turned down a vitali fight to face chisora? i'm pretty sure 99% of people would consider that a ***** move. are people really criticising haye for wanting to fight the better fighter? :-(
I'm a big fan of Haye and his boxing ability but this guy needs to beat someone to get another shot. I backed him before and got left with watching a non effort blamed on a broken toe. Step-up with your fists - not your mouth. Earn your ****ing shot or shut up.
If I remember correctly Haye had a choice, fighting Cunningham who was ranked #1 challenger at cruiserweight and coming off a TKO of Huck or fight a low ranked Enzo Maccarinelli. He choose to duck Huck and fight Enzo, then run off to HW to fight the Audley Harrisons and John Ruizs of the division. Who is David Haye again? Nobody. He has no titles and is coming off a loss himself. Who does he think he is to call anyone out and jump to the front of the line with his terrible HW resume. Who is asking him to turn down a Vitali fight, people are asking him to fight a person his age or around his age at HW. He is a joke.