Haye joining Mayweather, Green, Ward, and Sauderland in effort to clean up the sport

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BigReg, Jun 8, 2010.


  1. BigReg

    BigReg Broad Street Bully Full Member

    38,117
    5
    Jun 26, 2007
    There is no fighter out there who will turn down a big fight because they are asked to undergo OSDT. Wlad has already said he's willing to do it, and Pacquiao has softened his stance as well. More and more fighters are jumping on board as well. The only people that seem to be against this are people who are not stepping into the ring and who wouldn't even be subjected to such testing.

    Everything seems outrageous until it becomes the norm. Curt Flood probably was seen as unreasonable when challenged the reserve clause which was standard in most North American sport's contracts at the time. Many probably asked "how come he didn't challenge this clause in the 10 years or so of his career?" In the end, that's stupid ****ing question anyway. Who gives a ****? One day he decided it was unfair and he did something about it. Now, every sport has free agency because of him.
     
  2. DatBo215

    DatBo215 Active Member Full Member

    722
    0
    Jun 12, 2006
    Exactly. For years and years during the industrial revolution there were no labor laws and no one had any rights or privleges in the work place. That was the norm, and opposing the corporations seemed futile. I bet you all are glad the ******* mentally didn't stick in that instance.

    No one should care why, how, or when... the important thing is the sport is moving in the right direction. Aside from Pac there isn't another pro athlete that would/should turn down a big fight over testing. If they do their motives need to be questioned, as Pac's are.
     
  3. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    33,921
    133
    Jul 20, 2004
    I dont know if its that or if they are simply ******ed,do they think its just a coincidence that the first time these two clowns Haye and Fraud ever talked about having stricter tests was when they were about to fight their biggest threats Pac and Wlad guys they knew that could beat them.

    Both clowns same modus operandi,both talk alot of **** about what they're going to do to their opponents but when its time to sign the contract to fight the trash talk ends and the stuttering begins "but but but...you're bullet proof".
     
  4. Samski313

    Samski313 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,506
    0
    Jan 15, 2010
    :good

    :goodSpot On great post! It's a reason for people refusing to test to duck a fighter i.e. Manny Pacquiao. He ducked the first time now he wants to take the test. So all you *******s saying its a new way to duck a fighter wasn't saying this when Tyson asked Holyfield to take the test and Tyson wasn't trying to duck him. It's so crazy for people to come on here and say oh they ducking people because they want better drug testing! Makes no real common sense at all. Damn shame some of you guys go to sleep at night believing this ****. Drink the kool-aide all you want fools.
     
  5. Trendkiller

    Trendkiller 420 Full Member

    684
    0
    Apr 20, 2008
    I certainly agree with that... but naturally their motives are going to be questioned.

    Povetkin certainly tried to get out of the wlad fight using it, until wlad called his bluff. I do think they should bring in mandatory testing, if this happens then the sport would be clean and it couldn't be used to duck opponents.
     
  6. Samski313

    Samski313 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,506
    0
    Jan 15, 2010
    Bingo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
     
  7. TheJuggernaut

    TheJuggernaut Hitchslap Full Member

    7,253
    105
    Sep 29, 2008
    :lol:
    And its not like were against drug testing, anyone who says that is strawmanning. If the commission was asked for stricter drug tests then it would be different. If the boxing comission created more stringent drug rules, and we were like ""No Pac shouldnt have to do this!" Then I can see some of these guys arguments against us being valid. But Its so obvious that this drug testing **** was Pacquiao specific, not because he gives a **** about cleaning up the sport. Thats what im saying. Floyd doesnt give a crap about cleaning up boxing, and if you believe it you are a diluted nutthugger. I agree that universal stricter drug testing (NOT TESTING AS A MEANS TO DEGRADE PACQUIAO) would be a good thing, but not at the demands of Floyd, when we all KNOW it is all part of is smear campaign. I guess these guys also believe that Haye seriously wants to fight Wladimir, and also sincerely cares about cleaning up the sport :nut
     
  8. puga_ni_nana

    puga_ni_nana Dempsey Roll Full Member

    41,814
    5
    Apr 14, 2007
    and LMAO at some of the joyboys thinking floyd is really out to clean the sport. you guys are such a naive bunch believing in every floyd and floyd sr. word. :lol:
     
  9. Samski313

    Samski313 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,506
    0
    Jan 15, 2010

    Asking for drug testing is degrading to Pacquiao?:patsch
     
  10. TheJuggernaut

    TheJuggernaut Hitchslap Full Member

    7,253
    105
    Sep 29, 2008
    Dey also beleve that Pacquiao is bullet poof, bitches who I beat up should have boozes, and bill gates still makin dem ****in computers
     
  11. TheJuggernaut

    TheJuggernaut Hitchslap Full Member

    7,253
    105
    Sep 29, 2008
    Im not surprised my point went over your head
     
  12. bladerunner

    bladerunner El Intocable Full Member

    33,921
    133
    Jul 20, 2004
    They believe everything that comes out of the Mayweather's mouths no matter how stupid it is.

    They hear Roger on 24/7 saying some **** like "Chinatown is full of people from China" with a couple of "Mu****as" in between and they act like he just said some ground breaking **** that will change the course of mankind.
     
  13. enzo

    enzo Greatest Of All Time Full Member

    19,533
    1
    Feb 6, 2006
    floyd needs to clean his uncle and father first...
     
  14. TheJuggernaut

    TheJuggernaut Hitchslap Full Member

    7,253
    105
    Sep 29, 2008
    :lol::lol::lol::lol:
     
  15. igotJUIC3

    igotJUIC3 Boxing Junkie banned

    10,619
    1
    Jun 28, 2007
    its only a duck move if the fighter accepts the test and THEN the other fighter backs off after asking for the test...thats a duck.

    but you can not call the other fighter a duck when the fighter who is being asked to take a simple drug test start stutterting and lying and all of a sudden his feelings is hurt so no fight.

    How about you call the bluff its that simple but no....they rather there favorite fighter run away from a test that they too say is good for the sport but not if there favorite fighter isnt the one asking for it...fukk outta here.