Haye = PFP Tallent while WLAD Klitschko is a GOOD Big Man."RUDYARD SPECIAL"

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by BITCH ASS, Nov 10, 2009.


  1. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    But Wlad can easily hit and get hit when he dwarfs his opponent such as the case with Ibriganov, Chagaev and many others who he has a reach and height advantage over or his opponents are just plain timid.

    You bring up Thompson, but that was actually a somewhat competive fight due to the fact that Thompson who is like a southpaw but less athletic and less athletic clone of Wlad, was extremely timid.

    And while you say Valuev is slow, which I agree with, he would have hit Haye with his jab if Haye didn't duck his punches.

    There is no video evidence of Klitschko ducking a punch, so you can only assume that he would duck against Valuev even though his style is nothing like Haye's who's style is based upon movement and agility.

    Wlad's style is built mainly around his physique which is effective against the majority of opponents, but not Valuev.

    Klitschko would have to adapt to fight Valuev. His lateral movement alone is not good enough to get away from Valuev's jab. Haye who has better lateral movement still had to duck punches time and time again.

    Valuev is cautious but not timid like Thompson, and the thought of seeing a guy who is very tall and cannot avoid his punches in front of him may compell him to be even more aggressive because it is not been seen if Wlad can fight effectively being the smaller man.

    If Wlad backs up, it's doubtful that his speed will nulify Valuev's reach and tenacity. He will have to make adjustments, adjustments which are in doubt because there is no video evidence of him bending at the waist.

    You also have to note that the fighters besides Haye who had success against Valuev were very short compared to Valuev and they were effective fighters on the inside.

    Wlad has not shown that he is an effective inside fighter nor that his offense is incredibly versatile as he rarely ever displays an uppercut and mostly consists of a 1-2. Wlad's main attack on the inside is to clinch.

    In this situation given Valuev's immense size and weight, Klitschko's clinching tactic will not be effective. It will wear him down instead of Valuev who is big and strong but not musclebound.

    Now I don't know if Valuev would beat Wlad, but it would be very interesting and until he proves it in the ring, I can't say that Wlad is a PFP fighter like HAYE but more of a very solid one dimensional big man.
     
  2. ko_bros

    ko_bros Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,088
    2
    Nov 13, 2008
    I like how you make your arguments. But I honestly cant agree with you. I give you my reasons why I think he beat Valuev, purely because hes more talented and more powerfull, has better everything and if thats the case then usually the fighter wins. Its not like a good big fighter beats a small good fighter. In this case its a good small fighter beats a mediocre bigh fighter. Simple as that. You only want video evidence which Im not going to search for. Too much time.
     
  3. Vysotsky

    Vysotsky Boxing Junkie banned

    12,797
    11
    Oct 14, 2009
    Uppercuts - If you believe Vova doesn't have uppercuts you must have only watch 3 or 4 of his fights, i'm not even going to bother with this one.

    Vova as smaller man - Being 5 years younger than Vitali, growing up sparring with him would have meant that he learned by fighting against a much larger opponent.

    Amateur record 134 - 6. When posed this question about fighting a larger opponent (against Valuev) both Vova and Vitali have stated that they've both fought 7'0 opponents while in the amateurs.

    - They also spar with Ustinov who is Vitali's size.



    This statement again leads me to believe that you only recently started watching Volodymyr fight. Jefferson & Shufford fights, check them out genius.

    Hmmmm an explosive power puncher with quick handspeed and a glass jaw, you mean like Jefferson?



    Perhaps the valdity of your points isn't the issue but rather the arrogant, condescending air of superiority that emanates from many of your comments. A word of advice, people don't like assholes. Hence why alot of people will never be David Haye fans.

    Not the first time that you've made this suggestion, won't be the last.

    Ibragimov's footwork > Haye's footwork.


    - Again you asserting that you're bereft of emotion. I'll address this later on.

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4tSmswO4xY[/ame]

    Here is a 20 yr old Vova fighting Lezin, a southpaw (who in 1994 beat Valuev incidentally) take note of how he avoids some of Lezin's shots by bending from the waist.

    Now a couple things,
    1) You keep reiterating the same points and even more obnoxious is how they are weak, false, or opinion that you state as fact.

    2) Calling Haye a p4p fighter, christ. The whole size thing (him moving up, only being a CW) is ridiculous. He always could have fought HW. Boytsov, Povetkin, Chambers, Chagaev, Ibragimov all legit HW's that Haye is taller and naturally heavier than. He's the same size as Monte too may i add, so why all this unwarrented credit?

    3) The majority of your points rest on your assumption that Vova hasn't experienced many of the tactics and strengths you point out at any time during his career. Along with your assumption that he is unable to
    adapt his tactics and stratagy.

    One of Vova's greatest assets is his experience. almost 150 Amateur fights at the highest level and 56 Pro fights. I'm not going to even bother with this, hopefully they'll fight and we'll see.

    4) My favorite, despite your numerous and vehement claims that your motivation is not an emotional one i'd have to disagree. I am of the opinion that your driving force is Lust, as your passionate words glaze a thick coating of saliva on David Haye's ****, which you are riding.


    I don't care what your response to this post of mine is, i'm apathetic towards you and your "amazing logic". Plus i'm just much to lazy to write another post this ****ing long.

    P.S In regards to my opinion in #4. If you are ever thinking about possibly adding some body art to your skin to spruce up your appearance may i suggest.....
    This content is protected
     
  4. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    Directed to the guy above me because I can't respond to your post because you put a ****in dick on it which is

    A) Real ****in gay

    B) Innapropriate given I'm in a public area, but still even if I wasn't it's ****in gay

    C) What the **** were you thinkin puttin a dick on my thread?

    DAMN....

    Anyway, if you had to go all the way back to Wlad's amatuer days when he had nowhere near the muscle mass of today to find evidence of him ducking, that is SAD...

    Especially considering Wlad has been pro for many years.

    ****, I can't even really get my thoughts together because you put a ****in dick on the screen and I don't wanna scroll back to see what you said cuz that **** is gay...

    Even Wlad would probably slap you for that ****...

    But back to what I was sayin...

    If you look at Wlad's fight with Tony Thompson who is an ordinary and very straight up and down, and just an overall no good boxer, Wlad had trouble with this guy...

    If Thompson was just a little better he would have won some rounds.

    It's sad because Wlad didn't duck one punch despite being about the same height, nor did he land one body punch despite Thompson being completely open.

    Fact is, Wlad knows how to fight one way. He fights tall and cannot bend at the waist.

    A guy like Valuev would be an absolute NIGHTMARE for him.
     
  5. CHEF

    CHEF Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,319
    133
    Aug 22, 2006
    go look at the KO punch against Thompson. Wlad threw his right while ducking under Thompsons punch..... go look it up... who gives a **** about ducking a punch...like thats the only defense possible. The guy is 6'5". I dont understand your obsession about a fighter ducking a punch... Wlads defense is very very good...Let it go already
     
  6. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    Okay, so finally....I can find evidence of Wlad ducking at 20.6777 minutes on the Thompson fight.

    My point is, Wlad lacks agility. A guy like Haye would have beat the **** outta Thompson because Thompson is a very ordinary fighter but has HEIGHT and REACH.

    Being that ordinary he still made for a competitive fight with Wlad.

    Which supports my statement that Wlad is very one dimensional. I would love to see Wlad prove me wrong, but he obviously is more intent on fighting guys like Povetkin or maybe even Boytsov who are MADE for him.

    And honestly I thought his defense looked very overrated in that fight with Thompson. He does things that most fighters can't get away like moving back in a straight line. He won't be able to do this against Haye nor Valuev.
     
  7. CHEF

    CHEF Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,319
    133
    Aug 22, 2006
    I think you are underestimating Thompson... while not great offense...southpaw with very good defense. I dont think it would be as easy as you are making it out to be IMO

    BTW. Povetkin is a MAND... dont make it sound like Wlad is cherry picking:-(
     
  8. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
    I can look at Thompson and tell right away he's a terrible fighter.

    His body is WIDE open. He stands straight up and he doesn't throw with any authority.

    He's a guy who made it where he is by fighting nobodies and his immense size.
     
  9. konaman

    konaman Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,377
    1
    May 28, 2008
    Simple case of exaggerating flashyness and boxing bling and ignoring subtle technical prowess, and i am very supportive of Haye.

    Wladimir is incredibly skilled, his control of range through his footwork and the use of his jab (which is one of the best jabs in the history of the division) is phenomenal. He is also very difficult to hit. Haye's upper body movement was very impressive against Valuev, but he did get tagged several times by Barrett and was wobbling around the ring at times because he has poor balance and questionable footwork at times. Their styles are incomparable, but Wladimir is much more skilled, with Haye being more reliant on natural athleticism.

    Any implication that Valuev would beat Wlad shows inadequate analysis, and a poor understanding of Wlad's fundamental weaknesses. Valuev fights at a slow pace, Wlad thrives on this. Wlad has very good handspeed and accuracy, he would land on the defensively liable giant fairly easily, and would stay out of punching range with his footwork when he isn't throwing. Wlad does actually use subtle upper body movement in his defense, which would be particularly easy in such a rangey match up against such a slow fighter. He would easily disrupt Valuev's predictable offense through parrying and pawing with his right hand.

    Wlad's weakness is against genuine effectively applied pressure, through either volume or punching power or preferably some combination of the two, and although this is a weakness, its an incredibly difficult one to exploit. Valuev wouldn't apply buggerall pressure, and he certainly wouldn't outbox him.

    Haye is a P4P talent though, there is no denying that.
     
  10. ramalinga

    ramalinga Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,229
    8
    May 7, 2007

    Wlad's supposed incomplete defense makes him currently one of the hardest fighters to hit with clean power shots in boxing. Haye was in give and take battles with much smaller fighters like Mormeck and Fragomeni, who would never land anything on Wlad. Chagaev easily outlanded Valuev and didn't land a meaningful punch on Wlad, who has underrated speed, footwork when he needs to have it, good reflexes and a jab that nobody has gotten past in a long time. If Haye fights the perfect fight, he has a chance against Wlad, however he has never fought a perfect fight. He usually goes from brilliant to sloppy in one round. Or gainst Valuev, he wasn't brilliant or sloppy, he was just tenative, nothing that will help him against Wlad.
     
  11. jisi

    jisi Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,272
    1
    Feb 25, 2006
    Great fight from Thomposon with big heart!

    Great win for Wladimir!

    This content is protected
     
  12. BITCH ASS

    BITCH ASS "Too Fast" Full Member

    9,440
    5
    Jul 10, 2006
  13. BlueApollo

    BlueApollo Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,827
    3
    May 19, 2007
    Man that was a nice right hand. Steward's finally got him tucking his chin as he throws it also.

    I'd be mildly interested to see Wlad fight as the smaller man, but let's face it, he is twenty times the athlete Valuev is, and it's not in Valuev's nature to be an aggressive, come forward fighter, which is what has troubled Wlad the most. And there's also no way to build this fight into a worthy attraction unless Valuev makes another run.
     
  14. DOM5153

    DOM5153 They Cannot Run Forever Full Member

    12,340
    1
    Jan 9, 2009
    i agree with the part when you say Haye can be sloppy, but his consentration has def improved
     
  15. MemoCan

    MemoCan *****49ers Express***** Full Member

    4,924
    1
    Jul 20, 2008
    The is really "minuscle" Chef compared to some of his fans justifying that haye should be high as #3 on the P4P list....:rofl:rofl:rofl. Since these ****s flooded the GF with such asinine threads and posts about Haye beating Ali and being an ATG fighter, I have no doubt that these knob-lickers would propel Haye over Robinson as being P4P the greatest fighter ever when he beats Ruiz. Just watch:lol::yep