Peter was 241 pounds in the rematch and in excellent shape, you could see his abs in the weigh in. He was 243 pounds against Wladimir in the first fight, and 260 pounds against Helenius. Again proven yourself a complete Mong.
How did he win every round when he was knocked down 3 times? You have to be a special type of spastic to argue Wlad didn't struggle with Peter.
You could see his abs?? Look at this specimen.. http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02489/price_2489870b.jpg He looks better than Peter ever did. His stamina and conditioning must excellent right? Wrong? Peter was never in excellent shape. Didn't matter what he weighed. He plodded around the ring and used still gas out half way through a fight. Wlad going life and death with this D- leveller proves why he was over rated
This is one of my comments to you today below. Not only are you a complete Mong, you also have the memory of a goldfish. Wladimir fought Peter twice you complete moron. The Peter that Helenius fought is the Peter Wladimir beat 90-81 and by KO. Helenius score cards against Peter were 76-76, 78-74 and 77-75. Wladimir beat Peter in a far more impressive fashion, not losing a single round unlike Helenius who was drawing with Peter on one score card. You have proven again how desperate and stupid you really are. Not only did Wladimir Dominate Peter, he dominated an in shape Peter at 241 pounds, not the 260 pound fat version Helenius struggled with.
Regardless of what the judges what was your true interpretation of the story that unfolded in that fight.....I'm sorry but Wlad did not look poised and secure any little leather landed from Peter rattled his world and I'm not talking physically. Listen it is what it is, I say this often enough we can agree to disagree.