Hayes win are better. He is a two division titleist and was a unified champion in one of those divisions. Vitali has never been a unified champion of any division. SO wtf are you talking about
Nice you admit wbc champ Peter had no chance vs the great Vitali, even when he hadn't fought for four full years. :good
who cares how long he didn't fight? and I put peter on the list for vitali already. Peter is good but overrated
Must be hard to admit it, but in years time and after the dust is settled I'll take a 1 division champ vs a 0 division champ
this isnt a h2h thread. You can't even read a . Get out of my thread Vitali only has 1 more victory than haye over world title holders. However, Haye has 1 victory over a unified champion. One thing that Vitali has never been able to accomplish. IMO that puts him over the edge
victories at CW aren't "another division" really, they are just a subgroup of HW. CW is just an excuse to waterdown the already stagnated HW division. several of vitalis victories are over CWs of the calibre Haye beat..
haye is a cruiserweight going up and fighting modern SHW to me thats more impressive than a SHW fighting cruiserweights edit: sorry, "sub-heavyweights"
yes that's true of course. but CWs are just HWs really that the world boxing organisations have hlped create more money from with another division.. but you are comparing resume not feats, or opponent heights. anyway they are both HWs, if they don't like the rules they can always get another job.
I'm just pointing out that a smaller hw is at a disadvantage nowadays and always which is why CW was established.
whislt extra mass is an advantage in puncnpower if you use it correctly, its also a disadvantage in speed and fitness. CW was established to make more money, nevermind the lies they told you.
And Haye's comeback against #105 Mark de Mori is more impressive than Vitali's comeback against #2 Samuel Peter or Ali's comeback against #2 Quarry. And Chisora, Audley, Valuev and Mormeck are great wins:deal