Haye v Fury confirmed on Sky Box Office!

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Nafflad26, Jul 11, 2013.


  1. Nafflad26

    Nafflad26 Active Member Full Member

    1,314
    0
    Aug 22, 2012
    Confirmed on Sky Sports website.
     
  2. Kaz_187

    Kaz_187 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,945
    1
    Mar 19, 2006
    i suppose no point bitching about it saying saying its not ppv worthy as im sure they will get enough buys and thats whats it all about, will have to try get a decent stream
     
  3. Solaris

    Solaris Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    11,136
    5
    Nov 7, 2009
    Was happy to pay for the Froch fight but will watch this down the pub. No way I'm paying £15 to watch Fury. Guy's not even top 5 in the division and simply doesn't deserve a big pay day.
     
  4. elbrujito

    elbrujito Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,574
    0
    Mar 17, 2012
    the undercard has the chance to be worse than froch kessler with no excuse of a football match
     
  5. GJM

    GJM Active Member Full Member

    627
    0
    Apr 11, 2011
    I can understand why they've made this PPV. Like them or not, the pair of them will sell the fight and it'll do decent numbers.

    The interesting thing will be what impact this has on Froch. He'll want PPV again for the payday, but it will be pushing it if Sky do 2 PPV's back to back. This could force their hand in making the Groves fight as that's not PPV worthy at this stage.
     
  6. Solaris

    Solaris Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    11,136
    5
    Nov 7, 2009
    No chance that fight isn't a PPV fight.
     
  7. TERRYTIBBS

    TERRYTIBBS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,252
    8
    Jun 11, 2013
    Froch v Kessler 3 is not pay per view worthy imo! Kessler is shot and Froch beat a much watered down version, the Kessler that fought Calzaghe would have schooled him!
     
  8. elbrujito

    elbrujito Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,574
    0
    Mar 17, 2012
    think they were starting to talk about end of nov / dec for froch next so its a bit of a gap. they are desperate to keep froch ppv and with groves they will be able to get away with it
     
  9. andrebishop

    andrebishop Active Member Full Member

    1,002
    0
    Apr 4, 2011
    Down the pub for me too,

    Already had enough interest off mates who don't usually bother with boxing so that won't be a problem. Had 3 txtx off people usually not bothered 'are we going to Fury v Haye' my answer was 'nah can't really be arsed, I'd rather go Ryder v Saunders week before'. Think that puzzled most of em!
     
  10. Westy78

    Westy78 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,405
    0
    May 24, 2013
    Kessler is shot.............this makes me laugh
     
  11. boxfanlut

    boxfanlut Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,672
    7
    Apr 4, 2012
    He did school him, that's why he lost the first fight:yep:yep
     
  12. KidFrankie

    KidFrankie Member Full Member

    456
    0
    May 25, 2013
    Does anyone no what eddie/matchrooms involvement is in this?? At the press conference on the board behind them there is a hayemaker logo aswell as hennessy sports,park plaza and sky sports box office.

    Eddie looks invovled on twitter but matchroom is not on the boards?!?!
     
  13. KidFrankie

    KidFrankie Member Full Member

    456
    0
    May 25, 2013
    just actually heard its eddie that is working for hayemaker on this one!

    Good old david has employed eddie haha
     
  14. boxfanlut

    boxfanlut Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,672
    7
    Apr 4, 2012
    Same as the groves deal
     
  15. airdrie diamond

    airdrie diamond Member Full Member

    326
    0
    Mar 12, 2011
    Haye signed a 4 fight promotional deal with Matchroom at the end of April (the Charr fight was to be the first).