Haye vs. Harrison (Detailed Analysis)

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Emernum, Nov 7, 2010.


Page 1 of 2
  1. Emernum

    Emernum Guest

    The loser of this fight is the 2nd best heavyweight on the planet.

    The older a boxer is, the more time they need in the professional game (bar the superman effect).

    Harrison is in a different decade since 2000.

    I expect both men to beat both Klitschko’s in the future.

    Prediction: I’m gonna take a gamble and go for Harrison... worse case scenario is the stock of both men rises after this fight... that’s the only thing you can rely on in this fight... H2H 1. 2.

    Harrison TKO 11
     
    Emernum, Nov 7, 2010
    Emernum, Nov 7, 2010
    #1
  2. BoxerGaz

    BoxerGaz East Side Boxing VIP Full Member

    3,817
    1
    Jul 27, 2010
    Why make a thread on this when it could of gone in the Haye/Harrison OFFICIAL thread!
     
    BoxerGaz, Nov 7, 2010
    BoxerGaz, Nov 7, 2010
    #2
  3. Squire

    Squire Let's Go Champ Full Member

    9,120
    4
    Jun 22, 2009
    No, the loser of a fight between Wladimir and Vitali would be the 2nd best heavyweight. The winner of Haye-Harrison cannot be any higher than the 3rd best heavyweight, and guys like Chagaev, Adamek and Chambers can all conceivably still be ranked higher than Haye/Harrison, regardless of the outcome.

    The winner of this fight will be the best heavyweight in the UK
     
    Squire, Nov 7, 2010
    Squire, Nov 7, 2010
    #3
  4. BoxerGaz

    BoxerGaz East Side Boxing VIP Full Member

    3,817
    1
    Jul 27, 2010
    Agree, Haye wins this fight, but wont go higher up the ranks untill he puts a klit on their ass!

    G
     
    BoxerGaz, Nov 7, 2010
    BoxerGaz, Nov 7, 2010
    #4
  5. Lazarus

    Lazarus Realist Full Member

    29,937
    1
    Jan 1, 2010
    :lol: Very detailed, indeed...
     
    Lazarus, Nov 7, 2010
    Lazarus, Nov 7, 2010
    #5
  6. LocoRoco

    LocoRoco ★★★★★ Full Member

    4,886
    0
    May 3, 2009
    not official!!!
     
    LocoRoco, Nov 7, 2010
    LocoRoco, Nov 7, 2010
    #6
  7. BoxerGaz

    BoxerGaz East Side Boxing VIP Full Member

    3,817
    1
    Jul 27, 2010
    LOL agree its not official unitll its in the OFFICIAL thread!

    G
     
    BoxerGaz, Nov 7, 2010
    BoxerGaz, Nov 7, 2010
    #7
  8. Larryboys

    Larryboys Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,648
    2
    Sep 6, 2008
    It's clearly a wind up.
     
    Larryboys, Nov 7, 2010
    Larryboys, Nov 7, 2010
    #8
  9. Emernum

    Emernum Guest

    What good are rankings if the Klitschko’s aren’t the best?

    Evander Holyfield was the #1 ranked heavyweight.
     
    Emernum, Nov 7, 2010
    Emernum, Nov 7, 2010
    #9
  10. LP_1985

    LP_1985 JMM beat Pac-Man 3 Times Full Member

    30,096
    1
    Sep 6, 2009
    score mastro has a new hobby
     
    LP_1985, Nov 7, 2010
    LP_1985, Nov 7, 2010
    #10
  11. doylexxx

    doylexxx Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,986
    14
    Mar 4, 2009
    Im officially stamping this as an official thread as well, cant agrue with the detailed in depth analysis that seals it !!
     
    doylexxx, Nov 7, 2010
    doylexxx, Nov 7, 2010
    #11
  12. Claypole

    Claypole Boxing Addict banned

    7,071
    4
    Aug 4, 2007
    Even that's arguable, more like probably the best heavyweight in London.
     
    Claypole, Nov 7, 2010
    Claypole, Nov 7, 2010
    #12
  13. LP_1985

    LP_1985 JMM beat Pac-Man 3 Times Full Member

    30,096
    1
    Sep 6, 2009
    wat bout del boy
     
    LP_1985, Nov 7, 2010
    LP_1985, Nov 7, 2010
    #13
  14. Claypole

    Claypole Boxing Addict banned

    7,071
    4
    Aug 4, 2007
    That's why I said "probably".
     
    Claypole, Nov 7, 2010
    Claypole, Nov 7, 2010
    #14
  15. LP_1985

    LP_1985 JMM beat Pac-Man 3 Times Full Member

    30,096
    1
    Sep 6, 2009
    :good
     
    LP_1985, Nov 7, 2010
    LP_1985, Nov 7, 2010
    #15
Page 1 of 2