People in my work place were going on about it, pretty clueless but quite enthusiastic.Well done Media!
Happy with the weight for Haye. Fairly happy for Audley too, though a sub-250 would've been better. Still not watching this. BTW, seeing the 'worst title challenger' tag get thrown about a bit. Please...some people need to remember that Peter f'ing Okhello was considered worthy of a WBC title shot just a few years back.
When Jim Watt asked him if he enjoyed being the underdog, his body language changed. His attitude and mannerisms reminded me a bit of Nigel Benn...
If you know how to use that size, and Audley lacks the offensive footwork to make it a factor imo, infact thats why he wont be able to shut Haye down imo, cause Audley fights too flat footed, too methodical, too plodding when he comes foward, which will give Haye all the time in the world to move, set up his power, pick his spots when to attack, which will probably be when he's resetting Harrison when Harrison is in transition of moving to catch up to him. If Audley knew how to get his feet into the right positions quickly enough, then maybe he could be a more dangerous, but he doesn't, he fights on his heels half the time, even! when on the offense.
http://fightwriter.com/david-haye-vs-audley-harrison Houston knows how this one's going down. He gives Audley a few more rounds than I do, but the result is the same.
Holyfield got a lot of stick until he beat Tyson. The theory was that, despite his bravery, he hadn't the power or size to be a true heavy. Plus he was on the juice to help bulk up.