Haye vs Peter

:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

He got stopped by Solis:hey

 

Thats right, you make yourself feel better by thinking Haye can be stoopped, NEVER:yep

 

LOL, would you like a link to the fight??

 

You really are an arrogant *****. You give your country a bad name.

 

Ive seen it a good number of times:?

 

So if you've seen it, why do you speak as if he wasn't stopped??:?

 

There's no need to get offensive just because you're struggling to get your point across.

 

A combination of it being the amatuers, being a very young green man at the time & my inability to accept Haye isnt superman. Stubborness you see

 

:thumbsup

 

You obviously have never even seen a fight before - go and watch some boxing before you post anymore!!!!

 

He has no advnatges? **** off!

He is faster
He has more agility
He has a wider punch arsenal
He has faster feet
He has better defence
He has better offence

I could go on a bit more, but what exactly does Peter have on Haye? Raw strength, size, chin and what else? Not much.

By the way, I liked your little paddy earlier in the thread Resorting to calling people "mongrels" because you have no valid argument? I think so.

 

I am no fan of Haye but in time I am sure that he'd have Peter's number.

 

This a fight that Haye could win, but he would have to fight a perfect

fight being that he is the better pure boxer and is more athleticly gifted.


That said, I would still put my money on Peter cause he is far more proven

at the weight and has been competitive with the best fighter in the division.


Yes, I know, there is a possibilty that he is somewhat damaged now(Peter).:smoke

 

dont forget haye's piston like underrated jab.