Haye is starting to sound like the deluded fraudley with lies like these. Wlad was so terrified of Ruiz and Valuev he actually fought the guy who beat them. Chagaev was the real WBA holder and Haye won the paper title. Not sure why Wlad doesnt call him on this bull****.
to be fair the Klitsckos have been around for 10-15 years and Valuev and Ruiz were on top for a long period during that time and the fights never got made.
Yeah I wish Wlad would call him up on that bull**** about Wlad never going after the WBA title. Wlad should be the WBA champion. Haye's 'world' title is so minimal it's insignificant and yet so many ****s over here in the press keep calling him the world champion and questioning why how come he's the one that's got to come first to the ring. Even 57 year old Evander Holyfield is arguably more of the WBA champion than David Haye seeing as he beat Valuev before Haye did as well. The Klitschko's never fought Valuev because Sauerland and Don King held a massive slice of him and John Ruiz. They were happy with easy title defences because they all made easy money from it. When they saw Valuev was clearly on the slide (lost to Chagaev and Holyfield), an opportunity arose for them to temporarily give the title to David Haye as he'd make more money than Valuev was making. None of this "flip a coin.. they're both champions" bull****. There can only be one Heavyweight Champion of the World, and his name is Wladimir Klitschko. /end thread.
To be honest I don't think there have been that many occasions when a fight between either Ruiz or Valuev and a Klitschko would have been viable. When Vitali had his first championship run, Ruiz was involved in his thrillogy with Evander.... and Valuev was a freakshow undercard fighter.... from then on Klitschko was building toward the Lewis fight and Ruiz was losing regularly from then on until he retired. When Valuev first won the WBA title Vitali was retired.... and not long after Vitali came back Valuev got the BS decision against Holyfield and then lost to Haye. As for Wladimir, he too was WBO champion around the 2002 time when Ruiz was involved in a few controversial fights that resulted in rematches, when Valuev was a nobody. Of course there's the question as to why a fight between the two didn't occur between 2005 and 2007/8..... Of course there's the King and Sauerland influence too..... Realistically if that's the best Haye can come up with he may as well stay quiet. After all he didn't fight Adamek or Cunningham.
These remarks (and Hattons was even worse!!) arn't for analyzing by boxing fans, they are for sports fans. Don't take them to heart....;O)
If that's the case then well done David Haye. He'll deserve a lot of credit for beating a solid champion who's much bigger than him :good