HBO compared crawford to hagler, hearns and duran tonight

Their power is comparable

 

Jean has proved himself a lot more durable than a guy like Lemieux. You don't know what you're talking about

 

I get more of a Marquez vibe when it comes to Crawford

 

Stop trying to subliminally prop up Postol. We heard the Hagler reference when they talked about switching stances. Don't overrate their comments or take them literally. We got their point.

 

How many rounds did GG Lemieux go?

 

A middleweight version of Dulhorme would be Golovkins best win, Alcine schooled his best win Lemeiux lol.

 

Crawford is bad, bro. Dude may not be the top 5 p4p pugilist they tried to make him out to be last night, but he's a gritty, ambidextrous, well-rounded FIGHTER. There are some exciting fights to be made with him at 47.

 

Another moron.

Tell me who exactly has Dulorme beaten?

Lundy or Mayfield are his "best" wins, obviously inbetween being stopped by Abregu and Crawford.

Get a grip you willis:rofl

 

HBO compared Crawford to Hagler, Hearns and Duran.


I didn't know Sky's Nick Halling was working on HBO too :think

 

Well said.

What he needs to do now is fight some ranked fighters at 140, Matthysse, Imam, Barthelemy, etc. Then think about 147, imo.

 

A Ruslan/Crawford fight we make me proud of the sport.

 

Good call.

Ruslan would be a good "first test" at 140 for Crawford:good

 

You must be a Judah P. Benjamin descendent? :yep
Or perhaps, Daniel "Dan" Burros.

Either way, Your forefather DKSAB either.

 

a bum Lamont Peterson couldn't do **** with

 

First of all if I was crawford I'd take offense to the comparison to hAgler. Crawford is slick and smooth. HAgler is mechanical