HBO is stupid to boycott Klitschko-Chambers

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Quarteysjab, Feb 2, 2010.


Page 1 of 10
  1. Quarteysjab

    Quarteysjab Guest

    It'S a stupid move. this is the world hwt title, the most famous title in all of sports. you show it no matter what. HBO showed all those Roy Jones Jr. mismatches vs. a policeman and school teacher and dog catchers. Well Klitschko vs. Fast Eddie is a legit fight, Chambers is a full time boxer and #1 from the USA right now. This guy could pull off the upset, he has skills, is lefty, showing rapid improvement in results and conditioning.

    For HBO to not show this is stupid. it discredits the entire sport and the hwt title. HBO should stand by the sport and televise it, even if it's a beatdown. The US networks presumably showed all the Ali and Tyson fights against bums like Wepner and Evanglistia. Why not show all Klitschko fights. it's a stupid move by HBO. and then they''ll show Berto vs. Malignaggi or Dawson vs. Glen Johnson III right?

    fora US TV network to not televise a world hwt title fight involving a young American cotnender who has trained all his life for this is a shameful mistake. I'll say it again, HBO is stupid to do this and they are showing themselves to be losing even more credibility. F*** HBO, it's their loss.
     
    Quarteysjab, Feb 2, 2010
    Quarteysjab, Feb 2, 2010
    #1
  2. saul_ir34

    saul_ir34 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,549
    0
    May 6, 2007
    IT is pretty disappointing.
    Wlad usually puts on better performances than PBF and usually always ends it with a KO so i dont get why they wouldnt show it.
     
    saul_ir34, Feb 2, 2010
    saul_ir34, Feb 2, 2010
    #2
  3. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,036
    27,681
    Jul 26, 2004
    I know most wont, but i for one, agree.
     
    kirk, Feb 2, 2010
    kirk, Feb 2, 2010
    #3
  4. kirk

    kirk l l l Staff Member

    71,036
    27,681
    Jul 26, 2004
    Maybe they are getting ready to air Dawson vs Tarver 3 or something of that nature.... Im not saying that they dont put on good fights, obviously. What im saying is that out of all the complete **** they have put up, their not going to put up Wlad vs Chambers? a challenger whos at least going to bring more fight then any of wlads recent opponents since peter? the number one american heavyweight and for the heavyweight title?

    :-(
     
    kirk, Feb 2, 2010
    kirk, Feb 2, 2010
    #4
  5. lfc18titles

    lfc18titles Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,988
    0
    Dec 11, 2009
    dont worry, you can watch the equivalence of that fight live by watching paint dry
     
    lfc18titles, Feb 2, 2010
    lfc18titles, Feb 2, 2010
    #5
  6. Quarteysjab

    Quarteysjab Guest

    it's crazy. what message is HBO sending: we support boxing but we won't even show the world hwt champ vs. the #1 American challenger. but tune in for the featherweight title between an tasmanian and a cuban. dunce move, no wonder boxing has lost so much credibility.

    Youu got Nazzim Richardson calling Wladimir Klitschko one of the greatest of all time, yet HBO wont show him. HBO sure has gone down the drain since the new guy took over. Noo dispespect to Steward, Lennox, Merchant and Lampley, they are great. Kellerman is getting better.
     
    Quarteysjab, Feb 2, 2010
    Quarteysjab, Feb 2, 2010
    #6
  7. Polymath

    Polymath Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,651
    4
    Sep 29, 2007
    THAT is part of the reason they're not showing it. HBO have been very leery of showing Klitschko for a reason; the Ibragimov fight was well promoted, it was his chance to shine at the mecca of boxing, and the fight stunk the place out. If HBO show THE HEAVYWEIGHT CHAMP and its a shitfest, it looks terrible on them and terrible on boxing.
     
    Polymath, Feb 2, 2010
    Polymath, Feb 2, 2010
    #7
  8. Kid Cuba

    Kid Cuba Boxing Junkie banned

    7,712
    0
    Feb 16, 2009
    Your right, I mean what about the poor people who rely on Klitschko matches to help with their insomnia?
     
    Kid Cuba, Feb 2, 2010
    Kid Cuba, Feb 2, 2010
    #8
  9. Ring Master

    Ring Master The Originator Full Member

    12,223
    1
    Jul 25, 2004
    This year will be different. Mosley - Berto was signed on regular HBO.
    Mayweather - Mosley
    Pacman - Clottey
    P.Williams - K.Cintron
    Marquez - Khan
    Pavlik - S.Martinez

    And they have a lot more competitive fights they are planning. You got to understand, HBO has lost a ton of Money on Vlad fights. This Thomas Hauser put HBO on blast for wasting all the money they do. And some one at HBO was reading. But Hauser, if he really loves boxing needs to becareful...HBO keeps losing money ,getting low ratings and no subscriptions from boxing then they will get out of the boxing game. and put that money in the budget towards the next soprano's series, or the wire
     
    Ring Master, Feb 2, 2010
    Ring Master, Feb 2, 2010
    #9
  10. DocLouis

    DocLouis Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,127
    0
    Oct 14, 2009
    LOL. Some of y'all are cold.

    I actually don't understand why it's not on either. I mean, couldn't they at least put it on B.A.D. (no pun intended).
     
    DocLouis, Feb 2, 2010
    DocLouis, Feb 2, 2010
    #10
  11. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    Yes, really stupid. This could be a very good fight, even though, I think Wlad will beat him, convincedly.
     
    Boxing Fanatic, Feb 2, 2010
    Boxing Fanatic, Feb 2, 2010
    #11
  12. Delroc

    Delroc Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,324
    7
    Jan 14, 2009
    i agree, stupid for them not to air it when they have aired many mismatches in the past and this is a legit title fight.
     
    Delroc, Feb 2, 2010
    Delroc, Feb 2, 2010
    #12
  13. Henke67

    Henke67 One of the 45% Full Member

    9,468
    377
    Feb 10, 2009
    If they think the fight's going to be boring (which is a fair assumption) then why should they televise it? Wouldn't they be better spending their money on a fight they think is going to be compelling viewing?

    Just because HBO televised a bunch of mis-matches in the past, should they be obliged to keep making the same mistakes? I just don't understand that reasoning.

    Wlad is a very good fighter. He's also very boring. If HBO are determined to show better fights than this, I say good luck to them.
     
    Henke67, Feb 2, 2010
    Henke67, Feb 2, 2010
    #13
  14. Ambition_Def

    Ambition_Def **** the people. Full Member

    8,161
    3
    Feb 4, 2006
    The Klitschko-Ibragimov farce is still fresh in our minds.

    We don't need a replay.
     
    Ambition_Def, Feb 2, 2010
    Ambition_Def, Feb 2, 2010
    #14
  15. derrick

    derrick 6ft4 215 bring it on Full Member

    7,534
    215
    Dec 31, 2004
    Screw you nuthuggers. Just because you like to see your hero in these no risk fights does not mean everyone else does. People are sick of watching wlad in these no risk fights. Chambers is waaay to small for him and this fight should not take place. We want to see him get in there with someone that can expose his weak chin. Not a bunch of has been feather fist bums. HBO is doing the right thing. Maybe ESPN Classic will pick it up LOL
     
    derrick, Feb 2, 2010
    derrick, Feb 2, 2010
    #15
Page 1 of 10