Lampley is the worst of the bunch, Lederman and Lampley are awful honestly. Kellerman wasn't too bad neither was Roy but I felt Lampley over powered them with his bias. It was a draw for me but 114-113 is a good score for either man.
Lampley is seriously a cheerleading scumbag. Harold just likes come forward fighters, he scored like nearly every rd in the first half for salido too against loma, in rds I thought Loma clearly won.
Ward's face after Buffer announced the decision showed even he was surprised, and his trainer thought Ward was behind in the fight so he was telling him that he needed a knockout to win. It says it all.
Jim Lampley should change his name to Nate Higgers. He hated Roy, Floyd, Mike and now Andre. His "Gatti list" is the fringe of non Black fighters that have solid resumes. Does not surprise me at all.
I can't fuking stand Lederman. He is the P4P hack of boxing. Do you remember awhile back--maybe a year or two--when he was the color man for I believe what was an HBO card? He was HORRENDOUS! He pretty much stopped talking after the 1st fight because he was doing such a chitty job. lol
Yeah I noticed it too in the Gonzalez v caudras fight he seems to favour pressure fighters and never gives it to boxers unless they push back the other man. Nevertheless he shouldn't be scoring if your only gunna favour aggression
I slightly leaned to Kovalev as he is the champ but it would be by a round like I said a draw is the most fair result, what I will say is Lampley is the cause of this robbery talk, it was a tight fight between two hall of fakers close to their primes
