HBO polled a group of boxing writers and only 12% thought Pacquiao won last week

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Juv, Nov 20, 2011.


  1. megavolt

    megavolt Constantly Shadowboxing Full Member

    13,622
    34
    Dec 25, 2009
    Actually one of those judges scored it a draw, ****in inbred :patsch:rofl
     
  2. Cableaddict

    Cableaddict Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,705
    292
    Jun 15, 2011
    Not at all. Pac already has the official "victory."

    Now they want to generate interest in Pac-JMM 4.

    - And FWIW, what makes you think HBO posted accurate poll results? They probably fudged them, just lke the compu-box numbers. So now they want "just" enough votes for JMM to make it a controversy, without it looking like an obvious robbery.

    I'm sure the pro-JMM numbers were ctually much higher.
     
  3. 2 judges, oh that must hurt even more
     
  4. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    Exactly!

    Can you imagine what the HBO poll figures would have been like had the poll viewers seen the British telecast which painted the picture of a complete robbery???

    Those poll numbers were from HBO viewrers after seeing a biased call that favored Pacquiao, and the poll numbers still favored Marquez by a landslide.
     
  5. divac

    divac Loyal Member Full Member

    31,154
    2,108
    Jul 24, 2004
    If you're going to quote someone having it a draw or win for Pacquiao, you need to not point to anyone affliliated with HBO, as they clearly showed us they had an interest to see Pacquiao not lose.

    For HBO to have 6 commentating members, Lampley, Steward, Kellerman, Lederman, Merchant, and Papa, and not a single one of them have the fight for Marquez when Marquez has won every poll imaginable in boxing sites both fan wise and media wise by landslides, its says alot about HBO's tank job to have the fight scored for Pacquiao.

    Even worst, after the decision, Lampley stated, "it was close, but we think the judges had it correct.":patsch:patsch:patsch:-(
     
  6. timagen

    timagen Guest

    Nice:D

    Roid is ducking Floyd

    Roid is Roid
     
  7. megavolt

    megavolt Constantly Shadowboxing Full Member

    13,622
    34
    Dec 25, 2009
    Dunno about Marquez, but its cool with true boxing fans. We know the ***** didn't win, which is funny because tards like you started flooding the forum right after with "Please stop booing Pacquiao :|:|:|"
     
  8. 2 judges didnt think so,
     
  9. RoosterC

    RoosterC Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,242
    7
    Dec 23, 2010
  10. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    jmm took it 116-112

    even Pac did not think he won-
     
  11. Smokin' Joe

    Smokin' Joe ~ Dinamita Irlandés ~ banned

    12,229
    4
    Dec 12, 2010

    That's been your entire contribution to the argument all week.

    "Pac won 116-112". In every thread..

    Saying it over and over again doesn't make it so, you know.
     
  12. PityTheFool

    PityTheFool Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,192
    6
    Oct 18, 2011
    Like Enron wasn't a "robbery"?
     
  13. pac won 115-113
    pac won by face damage
     
  14. sdsfinest22

    sdsfinest22 Pound 4 Pound Full Member

    37,732
    1
    Apr 19, 2007
    Roid got beat by Marquez-

    Roid knows Marquez beat him up and thats why he wants a fourth fight

    Roid cannot beat a bigger and faster version, with more technical skills such as Floyd

    Roid is Roid
     
  15. Gooners2

    Gooners2 Archie Solis Full Member

    939
    0
    Nov 9, 2011
    It wasn't even close imo. Its only close if you start giving Manny the benefit of the doubt in most of the debatable rounds, but then logic tells you that your giving Manny the benefit of the doubt too much, and not giving it Marquez enough, and that right there tells its own story about who clearly deserved to be the winner.