Head To Head Who's Better P4P Khan Or Froch ?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Exactabox, Jul 24, 2011.


Page 4 of 4
  1. Arran

    Arran Boxing Junkie banned

    9,773
    3
    Jan 21, 2008
    so Taylor was passed it but Judah was a good win? a guy who had lost 6 times already?
     
    Arran, Jul 24, 2011
    Arran, Jul 24, 2011
    #46
  2. Back Hand Slap

    Back Hand Slap Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,270
    1
    Jul 18, 2009
    When you combine skillset,size,effectiveness and resume all in one, It's Khan for sure IMO. Big Froch fan too though.
     
    Back Hand Slap, Jul 24, 2011
    Back Hand Slap, Jul 24, 2011
    #47
  3. s23041983

    s23041983 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,180
    0
    Nov 12, 2008
    oh come on. how is this even close?
     
    s23041983, Jul 24, 2011
    s23041983, Jul 24, 2011
    #48
  4. anarci

    anarci Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,237
    64
    Jul 21, 2009
    Welll FRoch has the better resume...But Khans has finally built himself a solid resume himself.... Froch has very goodwinsbut i havent forgoten that he got a gift vs Dirrell and lost a squeeker to Kessler.

    IMO Kahn is a tier higher skill wise..If they were the same weight ,Kahn would be all wrong for Froch,and make him look clumsyand mediocre(barring a lateround lucky punch)..If you wanna bringMaidana fightup welll i think that was a break through fightfor Kahn(learning Experience) and that he has improved..

    IMO Kahns is top 10 pfp and FRoch borderline top 20.
     
    anarci, Jul 24, 2011
    anarci, Jul 24, 2011
    #49
  5. buckdacious

    buckdacious Sin~City punks!!! Full Member

    26,774
    8
    Jul 25, 2008
    Froch sucks, its Khan!
     
    buckdacious, Jul 24, 2011
    buckdacious, Jul 24, 2011
    #50
  6. BoxKing

    BoxKing Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,758
    0
    Dec 13, 2010
    They are both the pride of British boxing right now.

    Let's not choose one over the other, especially after Haye fell out of the limelight...
     
    BoxKing, Jul 24, 2011
    BoxKing, Jul 24, 2011
    #51
  7. peakbay

    peakbay Active Member Full Member

    1,157
    11
    Mar 29, 2010
    khan on skills (amateurish.all straight shots don't think Ive ever seen a world champ fight in his style but it works for him. i think he learnt his lesson about trowing hooks and uppercuts against u know who) but froch is ahead of him at the moment
     
    peakbay, Jul 24, 2011
    peakbay, Jul 24, 2011
    #52
  8. Opti

    Opti Active Member Full Member

    1,423
    0
    Jun 29, 2011
    Right now Froch is ahead he is consistently fighting against the top SMW. He arguable has been fighting the best of any current fighter.
    Who knows Khan may well skyrocket up the P4P but right now he's behind Froch
     
    Opti, Jul 24, 2011
    Opti, Jul 24, 2011
    #53
  9. Overhill

    Overhill Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,960
    5
    Jul 28, 2010
    ^^
     
    Overhill, Jul 24, 2011
    Overhill, Jul 24, 2011
    #54
  10. JoeAverage

    JoeAverage Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,150
    1
    Oct 26, 2008
    Khan has more classical easy-to-assess skills.

    Froch is much much more unconventional and has more intangibles.

    __________

    On resume Froch... on skill..... hard to say... Just like people thought Calzaghe had no skill and was a slapper... but it turned out his intangibles were hard to trumph ... Khan is much more standard - good speed, and pretty good technique, but nothing special in other ways - so Khan has to be fastest and best technique at least... whereas Froch has intangibles.
     
    JoeAverage, Jul 24, 2011
    JoeAverage, Jul 24, 2011
    #55
  11. BoxingAnalyst

    BoxingAnalyst Obsessed with Boxing banned

    19,099
    0
    Apr 24, 2011
    Very hard to say. Froch...just.
     
    BoxingAnalyst, Jul 24, 2011
    BoxingAnalyst, Jul 24, 2011
    #56
Page 4 of 4