...his family, and his people, and diminish his earning potential through false accusations, you should fight that man, especially when you said numerous times you would on multiple occasions. This is especially true when your opponent does not say anything disrespectful to you. Additionally, when you take a man to court for PEDs, and the accused asks you to reveal your test records, along with the accused, and you decline and instead pay the man (your enemy) THAT MONEY like a lil bltch, you should probably fight the man. Does anyone agree with me? Should you fight a man you talked all that ish about and then paid him like a lil bltch? Vote.
Floyd didn't take him to court. And he paid because it's cheaper than going through the legal fees, and quicker too. And Pacquiao request his tests? That's not how court works. Pacquiao sued for slander, so whether or not either one of them was on drugs is irrelevant in that courtroom. Pacquiao should've never sued in the first place. Do you know how court works? Court was unnecessary, if Pacquiao wanted to prove he was clean, all he had to do was take the test, not take him to court lol.
Pac dont owe Floyd chit and doesn't need to prove anything to him. Floyd opened his mouth, Pac sued for slander, Floyd paid up.
Pacquaio said, let's lay it all on the table. Floyd balked. And he paid PACQUAIO that MONEY like a lil bltch. Do you DENY he paid Pacqauio that MONEY like a lil bltch???
I don't deny anything, he paid him. The issue should've never gone to court in the first place IMO. But to prove whether you are clean or dirty, court isn't the place to prove it. Floyd has his reasons for being suspicious and Pacquiao has his reasons for not wanting a test. What I don't understand, is why all of the sudden, Pacquiao wants additional testing.
