Hear me out for a minute: Floyd would beat Sugar Ray Robinson

Yeah ... the evolution of the boxer over the years ... they've become more athletic ... more illusive ... stronger ... faster ... and a change of guard and skill.

Its the same with any sport ... yeah you have some fighters that couldve fought in any era and have been the same ... but the boxing athlete now is of a different mold.

I know the defensive stance that Robinson used has evolved --

 

ok if u belive all that crap that the sport has evolved bla bla bla do you think that a PRIME MAYWEATHER @147 beats a PRIME SUGAR RAY @147 ???

 

I hate Mayweather nuthuggers.

 

Yeah !!

I'm not going to jump and give the older generation credit because of who they fought.

SRL was very hittable ... he just had fast hands ... he's never fought a defensive fighter like Floyd ... he's never fought a fighter that match him in over all speed.

Floyd will go down as the best fighter ever !!

 

I wonder if the sensible ones feel ashamed when the crazies embarass them.

Like a ******ed family member who just goes out of his way to make himself look like a tool time and time again.

 

snoring FRAUD mayweather's sperm has clearly impared your brain's ability to think... you r clearly biased with these argument even I who ama big cotto fans knows that he gets KO by great all timers like SRR but IDIOTS like u refuse to admitt the truth with ur FRAUD mayweather fascination

 

Keep hating ... i'm not a nuthugger ... i'm a purist and I know boxing --

you probably have never analysed the fight correctly ... you hear SRR and automatically assume that he'll beat anyone of the modern era ...

 

What I don't get is how can people think Mayweather would beat Sugar Ray Robinson yet not have a problem with him going for easy money fights against DeLaHoya and Hatton. If he's really that good, he's got no business going for any easy fights; He should be fighting the best.

 

Sense. ^

 

So very ironic you would say this with Pep in you avatar.

 

Foreman got beaten by Holyfield and Tommy Morrison. Then got a title shot he had absolutely no right or business getting. He was getting walloped and beaten easily by Moorer and then Foremand happend to land a KO punch in the 10th round in a fight that was all but over.

Then he ducked a fight with his mandetry Tony tucker and was stripped of his WBA belt.

Fair play to him for making a comeback, but he hardly tore the heavyweight division apart.

 

Happened to land a right hand? That tends to happen when right hands are thrown effectively. Your dislike for the man couldn't be any clearer.

Yet, he was there, at that age and competitive. This being 20 after his era.

And with all of the "evolution of the sport, and nutrition", he probably shouldn't have even been competitive with those guys.

 

It sounds nice in theory but if u just take a look at how SRR fights than you'll think differently:hey

 

POWER SRR>FRAUD
SPEED SRR > FRAUD
RING IQ SRR > FRAUD
DEFENSE even maybe a slight edge to FRAUD
TECHNIQUE ( Combination of off skills and defensive skills) SRR> FRAUD
SIZE SRR>FRAUD
JAB SRR>FRAUD

so please tell me what does fraud brings to the table against srr to make u think he'll beat him besides a good defense

SRR wwill force FRAUD to fight him for some reason u think FRAUD is going to potshot him all night, but at the end of the day he KTFO of lil fraud cold in like 6 or 7 rds