Hearn answers the fans questions (iFilm interview)

To be fair it's not that bad, It's hard not to like Eddie even if he does **** me off sometimes.

 

It requires a lot of investment of my time to slug through 90 minutes and, with all courtesy to the parties involved, I don't imagine it'll be especially revealing.

Anything above ten minutes for a YouTube interview is bad content, IMO.

 

Fight of the decade potential if it was made

 

It took me best part of a day to watch it in fairness, 2 minutes at a time now and then, I didn't watch it in one go, that's madness.

 

I watched 20mins of it, got distracted by TV and something else.

I wanted to see intruding questions, not all this matey matey stuff. What kind of people asked this questions..? Most of the questions where ****, or about **** boring fighters.

 

I asked whether catering to the casuals with countless prizefighters its hurting the sport long term

 

That was a good question, one he didn't like answering.

 

Sounds like questions people from this British forum would ask.

Always talking about boring fighters, and obsessed with boring divisions.

 

I first thought you was a numpty that worked for sky, I have been proven wrong, you actually talk some sense. :good

 

the problem with a question like this is;

1) Hearn has already answered the question 100 times
2) The answer he gives you don't like.

 

What Hearn said about not being able to do 2 PPV's in the space of 3/4 months was interesting.

 

What hampered it was kugan having to go through the questions while asking eddie. Would have been better if he got all the questions in and then asked eddie. Still quite good interview though. Amsterdam for Froch/Kessler sounds good.