Wilder. However Parker - is the faster puncher - superior technically - much tougher - physically stronger - Has the superior resume - is overall the better boxer.
Pretty much the whole lot of it, Mitch. - is the faster puncher - superior technically - much tougher - physically stronger - Has the superior resume - is overall the better boxer. You state that Parker is both the "faster puncher" and is "physically stronger". Power is strength/time. That would indicate that Paint Dry should have more knockouts, especially considering the fact that you have also said that he is technically superior. At least one or more parts of this equation must be wrong. There's nothing to suggest that he's much tougher. Quite the contrary. He was happy to labour his way to a points loss to Joshua, without leaving it all in the ring. What does that say about his toughness? It says that he is either mentally not very resilient and/or that he didn't believe that he could physically withstand taking punches in order to get punches off. A tragedy, considering his apparent punch speed, power and technical skills, according to you. It's your weighting that you always seem to get horrendously wrong. For instance, Wilder obviously would not swap his right hand to attain all of Paint Dry's best attributes. It's like you owning 4 Ford Mondeos and somebody comes along with a Rolls Royce, and you're adamant that you'd rather hold on to the Ford Mondeos. There may only be one Rolls Royce, but its value is significantly higher than your 4 cars. How long do you think Deontay Wilder would have taken to see of Cojanu?
I can't understand your argument for Wilder to the faster puncher than Parker. Many consider Parker hand speed to be up there with the best in thendivison with Usyk and Ruiz. As for physical strength it I mean physical strength rather than punching power e.g. Fury physically bullied Wilder on the sindie and in the clinch and was clearly physically stronger of the two but Wilder has Wilder has more punching power. As for toughness Parker many consider Parker to have a very good "chinn". Having never being stopped or KOed and only dropped twice against known powerful punchers in Whyte and Chisora. Wilder in the other hand has been dropped by journeymen in Scroniers and Nicholls and dropped multiple times and stopped twice by a guy not known for his punching power in Fury. As well clearly being rocked and hurt badly by the likes of Ortiz and Molina. Would Wilder finish Cojanu? Yes, highly likely but that's Wilder's bread and butter stopping low level opposition. Wilder or his team seem very reluctant for him step up and actually fight top HWs (2 that Parker has already fought in AJ and Whyte) in particular against big punchers as well. Parker resume of wins over Ruiz, Chisora x 2, Hughie, Takam, Dimitrenko and Fa is more impressive than Wilders best wins of Ortiz x 2, Duhaupas, Washington, Spzilka, Stiverne and arreola.
You forget to add points for Wilder's draw v Fury - that result is better than anything Paint Dry Parker has achieved.
Drawing against a out of shape Fury who looked poor in his two return fights against low level Journeymen in particular when Fury was screwed and he really should of won that on points doesn't count for much. Even John Fury stated any half decent Hw would of beaten Fury in that condition.
Anyone saying Chisora beats Wilder needs there head checking. I like Del Boy but Wilder would take his head off