Hearn: "If Fury gets tonked out by Wilder, the Joshua fight will never happen"

Likewise, Parker dealt with Dimitrenko in a fashion that made him look levels above how Jennings dealt with Dimitrenko.

Therefore Parker > Jennings......Ortiz doesn't have a win against an opponent of Parker's level.

Whyte > Ortiz/Parker

 

LOL.

Parker is better than Jennings, i don't disagree with that but Ortiz is better than Whyte and Parker.

 

We will never agree.

So i don't see the point in continuing this discussion.

We've both took the thread off topic, so it's probably best to just leave it.

 

No problem with that. The thread was already off topic from the beginning. Every thread including the names
of Joshua, Wilder or Fury gets off topic.

 

Would be a shame. I always thought AJ probably beats Wilder, Wilder probably beats Fury, and Fury probably beats AJ. Just based on styles. I wonder if Hearn suspects that too, and would use fury losing as an excuse to avoid fury. Realistically, though, if Fury made himself a mandatory, ajs not going to drop a belt to avoid him. There would be too much fan interest in the fight still, and fan blowback if he ducked him that obviously.