Hearn says Khan Brook must be 50 / 50 split.

:good

 

Who gives a **** about aliases? We're on a boxing forum. Man up and start debating boxing..

Hearn talks out of his council gritter if he thinks Kell Brook deserves 50/50. Khan has been a top seller on PPV on Sky previously, he gets paid much more for fighting than Kell, he brings more money to the table and is the bigger draw, much bigger draw infact, anyone that pretends this is wrong is a fool.

 

I very much doubt that, son.

"Realist" The ****ing irony.

Get over yourself, you plank.

 

To be honest Khan is the much bigger draw and even though he is coming off two defeats(i thought he edged peterson), i see him getting the bigger cut.

But if i was Brook i would look past the short term and into the long term, a win over Khan will put his stock sky high and being realisitic... Brook wil bladder Khan, i cant see it goin 6 rounds.

Take 60-40 Brook, even if you have a world title, it will do you good in the long run. Low risk high reward in my opinion.

 

Khan is more well known but he is no bigger a ticket seller than Brook by the looks of the Sheffield Arena, he is also coming off two losses, one by KO.

Brook should go for the IBF, win it then fight Khan by taking the majority of the purse.

 

This thread looks like kids I see arguing on facebook.

 

just take 60-40 brook,if you win,which he could,he gets to move on to bigger and better things.
To be fair,khan is the bigger name in america, more people know his name in britain,but could he sell more seats than brook in britain,that remains to be seen.

lets be honest,even if brook had gone out and beat every man on the planet,was a undisputed world champ at 2 weights, khan would still want the lions share,its just the way he is,big ego little brain