Hearn says WBO Mandatory next for AJ

In his last 5 fights Whyte has beaten..

Chisora 26-6
Helenius 25-1
Browne 25-0
Parker 24-1

That is not a bad run, that run deserves a world title shot in my opinion when compared to others who have had a crack so I have no problem with Joshua Vs Whyte next.

Preferably it's Joshua Vs Wilder but if not Whyte is absolutely fine, let's not forget Whyte is number 1 with the WBC but Wilder seems determined not to fight him.

 

Wilder/Fury have rematch clauses, so neither can make that April date.

 

Are you and @superstarstu extremely dumb? Seriously. I'm talking about the Povetkin fight that just happened a couple of weeks ago.

The WBO said leading upto it that Povetkin would be their mandatory challenger, meaning that it would free up any mandatories for the next 18 months. Was that seriously that hard to grasp? IQ of a goldfish, wow.

Now apologise for how stupid you are. I've just took you to school yet again. You try and come at me sidewards and fail EVERY time. It's hilarious and very satisfying.

 

Are you suggesting that the WBO would enforce their mandatory status simultaneously to the WBA?

Why?

That not only discredits their own belt.....
But it also reduces the guarantee of them receiving sanctioning fees.

 

Don't ask me. Ask them. It's easy to find online. The articles are there, and the reporters whom they told that Povetkin would be mandatory have spoken about it on Twitter.

 

I'm not asking you.....

I'm telling you.....

The questions were rhetorical ffs.

 

Yeah, I forgot about that.


Is it possible the WBO blur all this until after Bellew Vs Usyk and then if Usyk wins and says he is moving up make him the mandatory for AJ?

Could it be AJ vs Usyk in April?

 

I imagine that would be too soon.

I'd like to see Usyk fight a guy like Parker before he takes on Joshua.

 

Schooled. Again. Now will you finally please learn to try and not come at me sidewards, as I deal in facts only. I have no dog in any race so to speak. When I say something like my original post, or leave quotes from people, then I'll always back it up when asked.

It amazes me why I seem to be in the 0.0001% of the population who can be objective. Now run along, child.

 

You make no sense man.

The WBO would not enforce the same mandatory as the WBA, you haven't got a clue.

 

At least he doesn't have Stiverne on standby.
But I thought this was already clear a couple of months ago. Joshua vs Povetkin, Joshua vs Whyte 2.

 

I’m mocking fans of certain fighters that subscribe to this type of thinking

 

When is his IBO mandatory?

 

Would the WBO order a fight between Whyte and Jennings to determine who is mandatory or will they just give it to Whyte?

 

I don't make no sense? Lucky for me I don't write up the WBO's policies then. You have clearly not went through the effort of looking for the information I told you about. So I'll do the secretary role and provide you with one link of many: https://talksport.com/sport/boxing/406454/wbo-anthony-joshua-alexander-povetkin-oleksandr-usyk/

Do you know what also doesn't make any sense? BJ Flores jumping from the high ends of the 20s to #14 in the WBC rankings despite not being in any fights solely so he could be a voluntary for Tony Bellew to help hype up the planned Haye fight.

Brown envelopes work a treat in this sport. Now apologise.