Hearn Turns Down Gavin V Brook 21st sept

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by gazrichards, Jul 30, 2013.


Page 1 of 3
  1. gazrichards

    gazrichards Active Member Full Member

    868
    0
    Jun 10, 2012
    Just reading one of the articles about the 21st september event at the copperbox,confirming walsh v murray in addition to ryder vs saunders.towards the bottom of the page i noticed this

    [
    This content is protected
    [/B].

    Yet another pointless offer to a hearn fighter who already has a big fight lined up and is a few steps above ******s fighter aka cleverley v froch.
     
    gazrichards, Jul 30, 2013
    gazrichards, Jul 30, 2013
    #1
  2. Solaris

    Solaris Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    11,136
    5
    Nov 7, 2009
    Gavin brings nothing to the table.

    Embarrassing from ***** yet again.
     
    Solaris, Jul 30, 2013
    Solaris, Jul 30, 2013
    #2
  3. Will

    Will Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,403
    3
    Aug 4, 2009
    Completely riddiculous.

    Much as I like Gavin he is not there yet and has no real right to call out Brook.

    Brook has moved passed that level.
     
    Will, Jul 30, 2013
    Will, Jul 30, 2013
    #3
  4. I Shot JR

    I Shot JR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,651
    1,798
    Feb 17, 2012
    He always says this though. I don't know what the point of these statements are.
     
    I Shot JR, Jul 30, 2013
    I Shot JR, Jul 30, 2013
    #4
  5. gazrichards

    gazrichards Active Member Full Member

    868
    0
    Jun 10, 2012
    I know kell hasnt smashed onto the world scene fully yet but hes far above british level which is where frankie(not for too much longer)currently is.so why step back down for a meaningless fight whichout a huge purse when you have a bigger fight lined up in your home town and are currently a number one ranked fighter with a world title opportunity in the next 6-9 months.

    ****** just makes these ridicoulous offers because he knows they will get knocked back and he can say"we tried to make the fight"what a load of bollocks from him again.
     
    gazrichards, Jul 30, 2013
    gazrichards, Jul 30, 2013
    #5
  6. Furey

    Furey EST & REG 2009 Full Member

    16,680
    6,790
    Oct 18, 2009
    Clev v Froch would have been as big as if not bigger than Groves Froch.
     
    Furey, Jul 30, 2013
    Furey, Jul 30, 2013
    #6
  7. Gullet

    Gullet Active Member Full Member

    679
    0
    Apr 23, 2009
    Brook hasnt moved anywhere...
     
    Gullet, Jul 30, 2013
    Gullet, Jul 30, 2013
    #7
  8. Gullet

    Gullet Active Member Full Member

    679
    0
    Apr 23, 2009

    Bigger
     
    Gullet, Jul 30, 2013
    Gullet, Jul 30, 2013
    #8
  9. Will

    Will Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,403
    3
    Aug 4, 2009
    Froch has no business at LHW.

    If Clev and ****** want the fight make 168.
     
    Will, Jul 30, 2013
    Will, Jul 30, 2013
    #9
  10. Furey

    Furey EST & REG 2009 Full Member

    16,680
    6,790
    Oct 18, 2009
    They made everyone fully aware Clev was prepared to drop down to 168...
     
    Furey, Jul 30, 2013
    Furey, Jul 30, 2013
    #10
  11. Will

    Will Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,403
    3
    Aug 4, 2009
    Thats not what I read.

    I read 172 or something similar.

    It was catch weight this catch weight that.

    If you wanna fight for a super middle title. Get down to super middle.
     
    Will, Jul 30, 2013
    Will, Jul 30, 2013
    #11
  12. Furey

    Furey EST & REG 2009 Full Member

    16,680
    6,790
    Oct 18, 2009
    Furey, Jul 30, 2013
    Furey, Jul 30, 2013
    #12
  13. Will

    Will Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,403
    3
    Aug 4, 2009
    Maybe I do need to read a bit more then.

    In reality Clev should look to fight some world class opposition at the weight in which he claims to be a world champion.

    Kovalev is a good first step. Though I suspect he will KO clev.
     
    Will, Jul 30, 2013
    Will, Jul 30, 2013
    #13
  14. Will

    Will Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,403
    3
    Aug 4, 2009
    I can't believe you just made me read one of thats trolls articles.
     
    Will, Jul 30, 2013
    Will, Jul 30, 2013
    #14
  15. Solaris

    Solaris Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    11,136
    5
    Nov 7, 2009
    Clev said he'd do 168, ****** said he'd never let Nathan fight at that weight.

    Easy for Clev to make nonsense statements that he knows he won't have to back up.
     
    Solaris, Jul 30, 2013
    Solaris, Jul 30, 2013
    #15
Page 1 of 3