Hearns chin in the Leonard rematch

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by 80s champs, Apr 11, 2012.


  1. 80s champs

    80s champs Active Member Full Member

    536
    71
    Nov 9, 2005
    For always being questionable,I'd have to rate it a 9 or 10 in that one. He took a lot of shots without going down.
     
  2. PernellSweetPea

    PernellSweetPea Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,116
    5,732
    Feb 26, 2009
    Hearns did not have a weak chin, he just fought guys who were sharp and accurate. Leonard hit him with everything that night expecially round 5 and Hearns stood up.
     
  3. TBooze

    TBooze Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,495
    2,150
    Oct 22, 2006
    Hearns' chin was never a problem, it was his spindly legs that caused him issues. Hence when he moved up in weight (175+), they became less of an issue.

    As for the match in question, Hearns tottered a couple of times, but got through the fight.
     
  4. 80s champs

    80s champs Active Member Full Member

    536
    71
    Nov 9, 2005
    He was very motivated and determined that night,ok I'd say an average chin,but many many other talents that are rare in most fighters
     
  5. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,429
    9,413
    Jul 15, 2008
    His chin was a weakness .. it was not very strong ... it was decent but nothing great by any means ... let's also not forget that Leonard had him badly hurt in the final round and Hearns was hanging on for his life .. if it were a fifteen round fight like the first he would have been stopped again ..
     
  6. fists of fury

    fists of fury Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    19,297
    7,047
    Oct 25, 2006
    I don't know...if anything Hearns' chin (or punch resistance) looked really suspect in the rematch.
    Every time he got in trouble, it was from a single left hook. Hearns won in my opinion (but it was close) but he looked in deep **** several times in that fight, all of it starting from a left hook from Leonard.
     
  7. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005
    His chin was still weak, as always. Leonard was washed-up.
     
  8. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005
    Well, they were hitting him on the chin, not on the legs.
     
  9. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,823
    44,496
    Apr 27, 2005
    :lol:
     
  10. natonic

    natonic Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,581
    83
    Jul 9, 2008
    If the second fight had been for 15 instead of 12, I think there's a good chance Ray would have got him again. I agree with the idea that it wasn't so much his chin as it was his frame and his legs.
     
  11. Vano-Irons

    Vano-Irons Obsessed with Boxing banned

    17,581
    8
    Jan 18, 2010
    I 100% agree with this. Manny Stewart said the exact same thing many times
     
  12. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005
    Seriously. How can it be his legs ?
    His legs went funny when guys hit him on the chin. It was his chin.
     
  13. DonBoxer

    DonBoxer The Lion! Full Member

    8,063
    34
    Apr 28, 2010
    I think at WW Hearns chin is a solid 10. He gassed in the Leonard fight.
     
  14. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005
    He was wandering on ***** street as early as the 6th when Leonard tagged him solid.
     
  15. prime

    prime BOX! Writing Champion Full Member

    2,564
    90
    Feb 27, 2006
    Hearns will forever be synonymous with chinniness at the elite level.

    In their first meeting, he was having his way with Leonard, when the first solid shot to the chin turned the tide against him, showing Leonard the way into the fight: slug with Tommy, bully him, harass that chin, for it can very well go.

    Sheer pride kept Hearns standing till the finish in the rematch, but, yes, he'd be a goner over 15.