Hearns v Calzaghe at 168 or 175 in their respective eras who would win?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mark ant, Mar 8, 2019.


Page 3 of 3
  1. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    joe cant really hurt hearns with his weak power high output style thats important.
     
    HerolGee, Mar 10, 2019
    HerolGee, Mar 10, 2019
    #31
    mark ant likes this.
  2. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    Would have been great to watch.
     
    mark ant, Mar 10, 2019
    mark ant, Mar 10, 2019
    #32
  3. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    Not nice, my cousin went to a special school.
     
    mark ant, Mar 10, 2019
    mark ant, Mar 10, 2019
    #33
  4. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    Brilliant!
     
    mark ant, Mar 10, 2019
    mark ant, Mar 10, 2019
    #34
    Beouche likes this.
  5. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    i think Calzaghes chin would be fine against prime hearns, but i dread to tihnk what happens when Hearns turns 43, then Tommy will knock Calzaghe down in round 1.
     
    HerolGee, Mar 10, 2019
    HerolGee, Mar 10, 2019
    #35
  6. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    I hope he didn't come out with shite like that?
     
    Wass1985, Mar 10, 2019
    Wass1985, Mar 10, 2019
    #36
  7. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    That he may do but there's a very good chance the he gets straight back up.
     
    Wass1985, Mar 10, 2019
    Wass1985, Mar 10, 2019
    #37
Page 3 of 3