Hearns vs Czyz

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by m.s., Apr 26, 2020.


  1. m.s.

    m.s. Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,330
    8,100
    Nov 2, 2010
    At 175 lbs and at 190 lbs. Who would have won and how?
     
  2. PernellSweetPea

    PernellSweetPea Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,116
    5,732
    Feb 26, 2009
    I think Hearns wins by late TKO like he did with Andries. And remember Andries beat Czyz, as did Hill, two guys Hearns beat. I think Czyz is strong but his defense was not good and I think Hearns busts him up and stops him by swelling late.
     
    Xplosive and Richard M Murrieta like this.
  3. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,340
    9,954
    Jun 23, 2008
    Certainly not Czyz
     
    Flash24 and Clinton like this.
  4. m.s.

    m.s. Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,330
    8,100
    Nov 2, 2010
    I'm talking about the Hearns that lost to Barkley at 175lbs and the Hearns that had a knockdown drag out war with Freddy Delgado at cruiserweight who previously was stopped early by Prince Charles Williams and Michael Moore. At that time Showtime was setting up a fight between Hearns and Czyz, Then Hearns struggled so much with Delgado that the fight never came off. I assume that was the reason but I'm not sure. Who do you think would have won at that point? Did you see that fight? Hearns was pretty much shot but it was a hell of a war.
     
    Last edited: Apr 27, 2020
  5. The Morlocks

    The Morlocks Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,717
    8,944
    Nov 21, 2009
    Tommy in 1. What a gutless cherry picking bum Czyz was and continues to be.
     
  6. Saad54

    Saad54 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,832
    6,601
    Dec 10, 2014
    At 175 Hearns by late KO or decision. He'd control the short armed Czyz from the outside and keep him honest with right hands.