Hearns vs. Hamsho

You seem to pick against any fighter that Leonard beat:-( Another thing Hamsho couldnt really punch. Where as guys like Kinchen and Roldan were big punchers. Besides Hearns was already on the down side by the time he fought Kinchen. The Minchillo fight wasnt close either. This is an easy fight for Hearns.

Very bad analogy:-(

 

The Minchillo fight was a shutout on two cards even with Hearns a teeny bit gun shy of the recently injured right hand. Only Rooter could call a fight like that close.

Kinchen vs Hearns actually tested positive for lidocaine and there was a bit of drama.

Hearns speed, power and massive skill advantage would carve Hamsho up. As for Roosters Roldan dropping his hands excuse, well no-one is easier to hit than Hamsho.

 

Right on! Mustafa takes the shots, keeps the pressure on , hits to the body hard (that is what conquered Benitez, Hamsho digging to the body and hurting him early and Wilfredo not wanting to not have the ropes to fall back on when it happened again.) and wears him down for a ko. Hagler did so good against him because hamsho is more open to hooks than straight punches.:rasta

 

Hearns by decision or later stopage ... a ko is possible ..