Hearns vs Jones Jr

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by tinman, Mar 31, 2016.


  1. Jake LaMotta

    Jake LaMotta Lights Out Full Member

    7,293
    1,482
    Jan 3, 2015
    Well if he's such a pure boxer, and the greatest pure boxer of all time as you say, he should have been able to survive more than 3 rounds. But then again the previous statement is full of horse manure :hey:good
     
  2. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    38,793
    31,385
    Feb 25, 2015
    He could have survived more rounds if he ran, but he didn't. He tried to fight fire with fire, but Hagler had the better chin.
     
  3. Jake LaMotta

    Jake LaMotta Lights Out Full Member

    7,293
    1,482
    Jan 3, 2015
    Yeah because he couldn't outbox Hagler. He had to brawl as he wasn't smart nor capable enough to outbox the superior Hagler...glad to see we finally agree :smooch:smooch
     
  4. Mind Reader

    Mind Reader J-U-ICE Full Member

    16,769
    32
    Oct 26, 2006
    No way does Hears-Jones go 12 in my opinion. A KO by either fighter wouldn't surprise me. If I had to pick, I would go with Jones by mid rounds KO.
     
  5. guncho

    guncho next champion! Full Member

    4,966
    515
    Oct 15, 2007
    hearns should say that he is fan of roy and ko him for 100k.
     
  6. theanatolian

    theanatolian Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,131
    6,934
    May 2, 2015
    I have seen Hagler fight, but I've also seen SRR, SRL, Whitaker, Mayweather, Toney fight. That's why I can only reply to your post with a "lol". Unless you think none of those guys fought someone as good as Hagler, then your statement is complete bulls****.

    Hearns was never, never a pure boxer, let alone being the greatest.
     
  7. Pugilist_Spec

    Pugilist_Spec Hands Of Stone Full Member

    4,937
    792
    Aug 17, 2015
    I would be willing to say that Hearns at 147/154 was every bit as good as Jones at 168/175. Having said that, the size difference gives Jones a clear edge here. He stops Hearns.
     
  8. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    42,012
    11,384
    Mar 7, 2012
    A given, yet he couldn't take out Ray?

    Oh wait, it's because he was drained?

    :lol:
     
  9. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    42,012
    11,384
    Mar 7, 2012
    How does it not have any relevance?

    Roy was basically just a bigger version of Ray, with almost the same offensive and defensive attributes.

    Roy was just as skilled, but in an unconventional way.

    He was just as fast, if not faster.

    He was just as hard to hit, if not harder.

    He had a lot more power than Ray.


    Ray beat Tommy, but you're saying Roy couldn't have done.

    You are talking nonsense.
     
  10. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    38,793
    31,385
    Feb 25, 2015
    With respect to Toney and Hopkins, they are no Ray Leonard. We're talking a Welterweight Ray Leonard here. That is a unique challenge.

    Ray employed a good strategy and he won the fight.
     
  11. lepinthehood

    lepinthehood When I'm drinking you leave me well alone banned Full Member

    52,103
    23,328
    Aug 27, 2011
    leonard was tougher. :deal
     
  12. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    42,012
    11,384
    Mar 7, 2012
    At what range did Ray land them?
     
  13. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    42,012
    11,384
    Mar 7, 2012
    Tommy wasn't almost as fast as Roy.

    This is Roy weighing 182 pounds:

    https://vk.com/doc120421579_253528094?hash=1fee9bf218897244f8&dl=448994860ba2d4739f
     
  14. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    42,012
    11,384
    Mar 7, 2012
    Why are you so convinced that Roy would have tried to box with him?
     
  15. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    42,012
    11,384
    Mar 7, 2012
    What did Roy do to Virgil Hill?

    Did he try and outbox him?