Hearns vs Spinks

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by 80s champs, Jun 12, 2009.


Page 2 of 2
  1. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,854
    10,064
    Jul 15, 2008
    Are you asking who was the pound for pound better fighter ? I'd say Hearns ...
     
    he grant, Jun 13, 2009
    he grant, Jun 13, 2009
    #16
  2. 80s champs

    80s champs Active Member Full Member

    536
    71
    Nov 9, 2005
    I guess that's the answer I was looking for. I always thought so too. With the greatness of Hearns the Spinks being possibly the best lt heavy,and Hearns not being in his true prime at Lt Heavy,I always wondered that.
     
    80s champs, Jun 14, 2009
    80s champs, Jun 14, 2009
    #17
  3. laxpdx

    laxpdx Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,931
    82
    Oct 1, 2006
    Again, Hearns get's KO'd. His chin and suspect stamina wouln't hold up too well against these bigger guys.
     
    laxpdx, Jun 14, 2009
    laxpdx, Jun 14, 2009
    #18
  4. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,500
    3,030
    Oct 18, 2004
    Basically,Hearns would start boxing Spinks and start off nicely, but around the fifth or sixth round, Spinks would put on the pressure, and with the Spinks Jinx, coldcock Hearns around the seventh or eighth round.
     
    Titan1, Jun 15, 2009
    Titan1, Jun 15, 2009
    #19
  5. 80s champs

    80s champs Active Member Full Member

    536
    71
    Nov 9, 2005
    Agreed,Hearns was a good lt heavy but not a great one. But I was referring to pound for pound sense.
     
    80s champs, Jun 15, 2009
    80s champs, Jun 15, 2009
    #20
Page 2 of 2