Hearns vs. Whitaker at 147 15 rds.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Joe E, Oct 22, 2007.


  1. Joe E

    Joe E Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,361
    42
    May 12, 2007
    Hearns was at his best at 147.Speed,,crushing power,and insurmountible height, and reach advantages.I see an early K.O.,perhaps in the 4th or 5th.
     
  2. Mankind

    Mankind Super Moderator banned

    1,417
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    As good as whitaker was i cant see him being able to do anything with the taller hearns.

    This is just a terrible style match for whitaker IMO.
    Whitaker doesnt carry enough power at 147 to KO Hearns.

    Im not sure If whitaker gets himself knocked out though unless he tries to bull through hearns trying to land some haymakers.

    I see Hearns just busting him up and huring him from time to time to a clear cut one sided decision.
     
  3. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,221
    173
    Jul 23, 2004
    Hearns via KO, or points.
     
  4. Joe E

    Joe E Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,361
    42
    May 12, 2007
    Agreed.In order to get Hearns attention Whitaker would have to hurt him,which he could'nt do at 147.Thanks Manny!
     
  5. DaveTheWave

    DaveTheWave Man Extraordinaire Full Member

    436
    10
    Jul 9, 2007
    Not forgetting the fact that Pernell could be hurt, Hearns would touch him and hurt him. Just a matter of time before he gets caught. Hearns has 7" on Whitaker! That's alot of punching up-

    Hearns KO4
     
  6. Shake

    Shake Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,633
    58
    May 4, 2007
    You can't outbox Tommy Hearns at 14 in his prime. Whitaker can't K.O him, thugh he could dig at the body when he chose to. Point is, Hearns can fight his fight, Whitaker can't fight his.
     
  7. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
    Hearns by UD or mid-to-late round TKO

    The worst possible style matchup for Sweet Pea
     
  8. Longhhorn71

    Longhhorn71 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,714
    3,457
    Jan 6, 2007
    Hearns best offensive punch is his right hand which is disaster for southpaws.

    But Whitaker did all that weird defensive moves and stuff.

    I concur with the wide Hearns UD with a flash Whitaker KD early in the fight.
     
  9. sues2nd

    sues2nd Fading into Bolivian... Full Member

    9,760
    8
    Aug 7, 2004
    Exactly how I see it.
     
  10. Sonny Carson

    Sonny Carson Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,995
    6
    Jan 7, 2007
    I agree.
     
  11. SugarRay

    SugarRay Active Member Full Member

    688
    3
    Mar 18, 2006
    Agreed. Sugar Ray Leonard as great as he was could not outbox Hearns. He had to out-punch him. I don't see Whitaker doing that. Whitaker would receive a beating of his lifetime or maybe 2 lifetimes. I honestly believe that if Hearns had a better chin (like Leonards or Robinsons) he would be all-time P4P #1. Yes, better than Robinson.
     
  12. errsta

    errsta Boxing Addict banned

    6,321
    1
    Jul 31, 2004
    hearns + a chin may very well be the best WW this side of Ray Robinson.

    Against whitaker, the chin would not even factor in.

    Hearns via lopsided UD but most likely by stoppage.
     
  13. brownpimp88

    brownpimp88 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,378
    10
    Feb 26, 2007
    whitaker + julian jackson power would be even better
     
  14. pryorgatti

    pryorgatti Active Member Full Member

    1,180
    2
    Nov 1, 2004
    Can you be a defansive wizard with that kind of power? I don't think so ...
     
  15. Robbi

    Robbi Marvelous Full Member

    15,221
    173
    Jul 23, 2004
    Hearns gets massive compliments for his skill, and rightly so. He was a great boxer who could control opponents with his left hand alone. When you talk about pure boxing, Hearns without question among the greatest ever to step between the ropes. He would have been a top 5 ATG if his chin was like a rock.

    What about Whitaker with power though?. That sure is a scary thought.