Heavyweight Champions + Notable contenders resume against current top ten opposition

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by lufcrazy, Apr 28, 2011.


  1. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    473
    Oct 6, 2004
    You have Ali at the top of the list. by allocating 4 points for a win, thent 3 etc. I was just wondering what his actual total point score was. Same for the others that you put in order of totals but didnt say what their total was.
     
  2. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,482
    21,887
    Sep 15, 2009
    I will look at losses but it's hard to gauge, i'll give it a shot tho.

    I'll try and do jeanette, mcvea, moore, loughran and sharkey.

    I'll put up the scores, but i'd like to point out i've slightly updated my list to split top ten opposition into top 5 or number 1 contender.

    I've done langford and wills, the trouble is they both have 20+ notable victories with the majority being over one person so I need to weight it down somehow.

    The next rankings I do will weigh defences the same as non-defences.
     
  3. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,482
    21,887
    Sep 15, 2009
    I've tried to iron out any mistakes I made, but here is the latest breakdowns. I've added the main black contenders from the 1900's.

    This only shows which top 10 ranked opposition they fought throughout their career. I have actually broken it down to top 5 and leading contender on my spreadsheet.

    Key: CC=current champ, TD = title defence, NC=non-current champ.

    Sullivan: 7 years: Donaldson, Dalton, Ryan (x2), Elliot, Mitchell, Slade, Mcaffrey, Kilrain (TD).

    Corbett: 5 years: Choynski (x2), Kilrain, Mcaffrey, Mccoy, Sullivan (CC)

    Fitzsimmons: 2 years: Hall, Choynski, Maher, Corbett (CC), Ruhlin, Sharkey, O’Brien

    Jeffries: 6 years: Sharkey (x2, 1TD), Armstrong, Fitzsimmons (x2, CC + TD), Corbett (x2, 2TDNC), Kennedy, Ruhlin (TD)

    Hart: 1 year: Carter( x2), Ferguson, Ruhlin, Johnson (NC), Root, Sullivan, Ross

    Burns: 3 years: Hart (CC), O’Brien (TD)

    Johnson: 7 years: Childs, Gardner, Martin, Mcvea (x3), Ferguson, Jeanette (x4), Langford, Fitsimmons (NC*), Flynn, Burns (CC), Ross (TD), Kaufman (TD), Ketchel (TD), Jeffries (TDNC*), Moran (TD),

    Willard: 4 years: J. Johnson (CC), Moran (TD), F. Johnson

    Dempsey: 7 years: Morris, Fulton, Miske (x2, 1TD), Willard (CC), Brennan (TD), Carpentier (TD), Gibbons (TD), Firpo (TD), Sharkey (NC)

    Tunney: 2 years: Spalla, Risko, Dempsey (x2, CC, TDNC), Heeney (TD)

    Schmeling: 2 years: Risko, Uzcudun, Sharkey (CC), Stribling (TD), Walker, Neusel, Louis (NC)

    Sharkey: 1 years: F. Johnson, Renault, Gorman, Godfrey, Wills, Maloney, Delaney, Stribling, Carnera (NC), Schmelling (CC)

    Carnera: 1 year: Stribling, Godfrey, Levinsky, Schaaf, Sharkey (CC)

    Baer: 1 year: Risko, Levinsky (x2), Schaaf, Griffiths, Schmelling (NC), Carnera (CC), Farr, Galento

    Braddock: 2 years: Lasky, Baer (CC), Farr

    Louis: 12 years: Massera, Ramage (x2), Perroni, Brown, Carnera (NC), Levinsky, Baer (NC), Retzlaff, Attore, Braddock (CC), Farr (TD), Mann (TD), Schmelling (TDNC), Galento (TD), Pastor (TD), Godoy (x2TD), Paycheck (TD), Burman (TD), Simon (x2, 2TD), Baer (x2, 2TD), Conn (x2, 2TD), Nova (TD), Mauriello (TD), Walcott (x2, 2TDNC), Savold, Brion

    Charles: 2 years: Maxim (x4, 1TD), Bivins (x2), Baksi, Walcott (x2, NC +TDNC), Valentino (TD), Louis (TDNC), Oma (TD), Layne (x2), Brion, Harrison, Wallace, Satterfield

    Walcott: 1 year: Sheppard, Murray, Baksi, Bivins, Gomez, Oma, Maxim (x2), Ray, Johnson, Agramonte, Charles (x2, CC + TDNC)

    Marciano: 4 years: Lastarza (x2, 1TD), Layne, Louis (NC), Matthews, Walcott (x2, CC + TDNC), Charles (x2, TDNC), Cockell (TD), Moore (TD)

    Patterson: 5 years: Harrison, Slade, Jackson (x2, 1TD), Moore, Harris (TD), London (TD), Johanneson (x2, CC +TDNC), Machen, Chuvalo, Bonavena

    Johanneson : 1 year: Machen, Patterson (CC)

    Liston: 2 years: Bethea, DeJohn, Williams, Harris, Folley, Machen, Patterson (x2, CC + TDNC), Clark

    Ali: 11 years: Daniels, Lazarante, Moore, Jones, Cooper, Liston (x2, CC+TDNC), Patterson (x2, TDNC, NC), Chuvalo (TD), London (TD), Mildenberger (TD), Terrell (TD), Folley (TD), Quarry (x2), Bonavena, Ellis, Foster, Bugner (x2, TD), Norton (x2, TD), Frazier (x2, NC + TDNC), Foreman (CC), Wepner (TD), Lyle (TD), Young (TD), Evangelista (TD), Shavers (TD), L. Spinks (CC)

    Frazier: 3 years: Bonavena (x2), Chuvalo, Ramos, Quarry (x2), Ellis, Foster (TD), Ali (TDNC), Bugner

    Foreman: 4 years: Chuvalo, Frazier (x2 CC +NC), Norton (TD), Lyle, Moorer (CC),
    L. Spinks: 0 years: Ali (CC), Evangelista, Mercardo

    Holmes: 5 years: Shavers (x2), Norton, Evangelista, Weaver, Zanon, Jones, LeDoux, Ali (CC), Berbick (TD), Spinks (TDNC), Cooney (TD), Cobb (TD) Witherspoon (TD), Smith (TD), Bey (TD), Williams (TD), Mercer

    M. Spinks: 3 years: Holmes (x2, CC + TDNC)

    Tyson : 2 years: Berbick, Smith, Thomas, Tucker, Biggs, Holmes (NC*), Spinks (CC) , Williams (TD), Ruddock (x2), Bruno, Seldon,

    Douglas: 0 years: Page, Berbick, Tyson (CC)

    Holyfield: 3 years: Thomas, Dokes, Rodrigues, Douglas (CC), Foreman (TDNC), Holmes (TDNC), Bowe (CC), Tyson (x2 NC), Moorer (NC), Rahman

    Bowe: 1 year: Holyfield (x2 CC + NC), Hide, Golota (x2)

    Moorer: 0 years: Holyfield (CC)

    Briggs: 1 year: Foreman (CC), Lyakhovic

    Lewis: 6 years: Ruddock, Tucker, Jackson, Butler, Mercer, Mccall, Akinwade, Golota, Briggs (CC), Holyfield (TDNC), Grant (TD), Tua (TD), Rahman (CC), Tyson (TDNC), V. Klitschko (TD)

    Rahman: 0 years: Lewis (CC), Barrett


    V. Klitschko: 1 year: Kirk Johnson, Sanders, Williams (TD), Peter, Gomez, Arreola, Kevin Johnson, Solis, Briggs (NC*)

    W. Klitschko: 2 years: Byrd (x2), McCline, Peter, Brock, Brewster, Ibragimov, Thompson, Rahman
    (NC*), Chagaev, Chambers (TD)

    Langford: Jeanette (x8), Ross, Flynn (x2), Schreck, Ketchel, Lang, Mcvea(x4), D. Flynn, Smith, Wills (x2), Norfolk, Battling Jim Johnson (x2)

    Wills: Langford (x9), Mcvea, Jeanette, Fulton, Firpo, Weinert

    Jeanette: Johnson, Mcvea (x2), Ferguson (x2), D. Flynn, Ross, Jim Johnson (x4), Carpentier, Pelkey, Langford (x2), Norfolk (x2)

    Mcvea: Carter, Martin, Jeanette, Langford (x2), Pelkey, Jim Johnson, Will (x2)
     
  4. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,482
    21,887
    Sep 15, 2009
    Ok, this time I've weighted it as follows:

    2 points for every year they were champion
    6 points for every fighter they beat in the top 10
    7 points for every fighter they beat in the top 5
    8 points for every fighter they beat who was the highest ranked at the time
    9 points for beating "the man"
    4 points for beating someone who was or would become "the man"

    This content is protected
     
    Last edited: Jul 17, 2022
  5. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,482
    21,887
    Sep 15, 2009
    from what i can gather these guys were ranked at the time of the fight, any mistakes spotted though and i'll change what i can :good
     
  6. Pachilles

    Pachilles Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,294
    28
    Nov 15, 2009
    Nobody that drew the colour line was a lineal champion
     
  7. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,482
    21,887
    Sep 15, 2009
    Not really relevant to the thread. More of a technicality. There is a thread on the front page about linear champs however :)
     
  8. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,482
    21,887
    Sep 15, 2009
    That's what the * is for, just listed him as a former champ.
     
  9. johnmaff36

    johnmaff36 Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,793
    578
    Nov 5, 2009
    jesus, never noticed that. Your quite right.
    Still, kudos for the effort put in
     
  10. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,482
    21,887
    Sep 15, 2009
    On my sister thread to this one i've looked at guys who were top ranked at any point in their career.

    Both foreman and frazier rank a lot higher in that list.
     
  11. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,585
    27,248
    Feb 15, 2006
    I think that some of the earlier fighters might have lost out, and in some cases gained names unwarantedly.

    In Sullivans case, I think that Joe Goss, Alf Greenfield and Jack Burke would definitely have been top 10 names. I think that Herald and Wilson probably would as well. On the flip side, I can see no justification for Slade being considered top 10 despite the hype surrounding him. Dalton was highly regarded, but I cannot categoricaly say that he would have been in the top 10 when Sullivan met him.

    In Corbett's case, I think that Jack Burke would have to be mentioned and possibly others.

    In Fitzsimmons case, I think Dunkhorst would have to be considered. For all his limitations he was coming off a win over Bob Armstrong who had just beaten Denver Ed Martin.

    In Jefries case, I would have to say that Munro was definitely seen as a top 10 name when Jeffries met him.

    I could add some names for later fighters as well.
     
  12. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,482
    21,887
    Sep 15, 2009
    Yes definitely!

    The pre 1920's contenders were increasingly more difficult to nail down with conflicting reports and guys from the lower weight still being regarded as credible challengers for the heavyweights and ofcourse any incomplete records etc. I found it difficult deciding who to include and who not to.

    Would greatly appreciate any help!

    If it isn't too laborious you could also look at the sister thread to this one that has a slightly broader spectrum!
     
  13. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,482
    21,887
    Sep 15, 2009
    I think I need to remove choynski from fitz's resume as well because it was a middleweight fight by my reckoning.
     
  14. brb

    brb Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,133
    64
    Sep 14, 2010
    Foreman is not looking so good here.

    I like the list, but come to think of it, I think this might not be fair to title holders now a days. I think using this method makes it very difficult for them to accumulate as many points as champs in the past due to having to fight multiple champs (titlists).
     
  15. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,482
    21,887
    Sep 15, 2009
    Well of course in simple points system without context or interpretation will never work perfectly.

    However, modern champions get more credit for unifying belts than old champions would for fighting their number 1 contender.