heavyweight of the year 2009

Because you're from London? :rofl

Vitali fought 3 times winning 2 by knockout. He gets my vote. Wladimir would be 2nd since he only fought once.

 

Because he ran in 1 fight he's better than dominating 3 fighters? Bollocks.

 

Definetly Vitali.

 

He's generally a good poster buy barely beating Valuev doesn't rank higher than Vitali utterly dominating 3 legit heavies and probably losing 1 or 2 rounds total for the 3 fights combined.

 

David Haye...the guy that made us care again

 

1. Vitali
2. Chambers
3. Waldo/Haye

 

What I dont get is how Valuev was the biggest bum at the weight and then when Haye beats him he suddenly more credible.

 

I'd def say Vitali b/c he fought 3 fights in 2009 and barely lost a round.

 

Vitali 1 with 3 good defenses. Wlad at 2 for winning the Ring HWT title the first in 5 years. Haye in 3rd by taking a belt. Chambers at 4 for moving up the ladder vs Peter and Dimitrenko and Povetkin at 5 for being avtive waiting for his title shot down the road making improvements in every fight and improving his corner for the fight.

 

:rofl

 

True

btw that child molester made some good music may he rest in pain

 

That would be fair since Chambers has 2 good wins & Wlad & Haye only have 1 each. Even so, I'd think Wlad TKOing Chagaev is better than Haye barely beating Valuev. Better competition & better, more decisive result. Wlad also won the Ring title with that win.

1. Vitali
2. Chambers
3. Wladimir
4. Haye

 

by far Vitali. 3 defences., then Chambers, then Wlad, then Haye. IMO I put Wlad above Haye for beating the #3 guy Chagaev and winning the RING title. While Haye did win a belt.. he also RAN from the 2 best HW's...IMO that hurts his win over Valuev as best of 2009

 

Exactly. Perspective people................Valuev wasn't considered the 2nd or 3rd best Heavy even though he technically had a belt, he lost to Chagaev who Wladimir completely dominated and TKO'd.

 

why? For one fight? Could it actually be called a fight?